Filter Data
DataSet
(
Filter Results by DataSet
)
Select DataSet
USDA Beltsville
Dairy Digestion (NRC 2001)
Dairy Digestion (2019)
Dairy Fat Digestion (2019)
Dairy Amino Acid Supplementation (2019)
Lofgreen Garrett Beef Data
Environmental Stress Data
Microbial Data (2019)
Broiler Chickens Data (2019)
Beef Digestibility (2019)
No Filter
References
(
Filter Results by Reference
)
Select References
A) Ahvenjarvi, S., Vanhatalo, A. & Huhtanen, P. Supplementing barley or rapeseed meal to dairy cows fed grass-red clover silage: I. Rumen degradability and microbial flow. J Anim Sci.80 (8), 2176-2187, (2002). B) Korhonen, M., Ahvenja?rvi, S., Vanhatalo, A. & Huhtanen, P. Supplementing barley or rapeseed meal to dairy cows fed grass-red clover silage: II. Amino acid profile of microbial fractions1. Journal of Animal Science. 80 (8), 2188-2196, (2002).
A) Brito, A. F. et al. Alfalfa cut at sundown and harvested as baleage increases bacterial protein synthesis in late-lactation dairy cows. J Dairy Sci.92 (3), 1092-1107, (2009). B) Brito, A. F. et al. Alfalfa Cut at Sundown and Harvested as Baleage Improves Milk Yield of Late-Lactation Dairy Cows1. Journal of Dairy Science. 91 (10), 3968-3982, (2008).
A) Brito, A. F., Broderick, G. A. & Reynal, S. M. Effect of varying dietary ratios of alfalfa silage to corn silage on omasal flow and microbial protein synthesis in dairy cows. J Dairy Sci.89 (10), 3939-3953, (2006). B) Brito, A. F. & Broderick, G. A. Effect of varying dietary ratios of alfalfa silage to corn silage on production and nitrogen utilization in lactating dairy cows. J Dairy Sci.89 (10), 3924-3938, (2006).
A) Colmenero, J. J. & Broderick, G. A. Effect of dietary crude protein concentration on ruminal nitrogen metabolism in lactating dairy cows. J Dairy Sci.89 (5), 1694-1703, (2006). B) Colmenero, J. J. & Broderick, G. A. Effect of dietary crude protein concentration on milk production and nitrogen utilization in lactating dairy cows. J Dairy Sci.89 (5), 1704-1712, (2006).
A) Harvatine, K. J. & Allen, M. S. Effects of fatty acid supplements on milk yield and energy balance of lactating dairy cows. J Dairy Sci.89 (3), 1081-1091, (2006). B) Harvatine, K. J. & Allen, M. S. Effects of Fatty Acid Supplements on Feed Intake, and Feeding and Chewing Behavior of Lactating Dairy Cows. Journal of Dairy Science. 89 (3), 1104-1112, (2006).
A) Oba, M. & Allen, M. S. Effects of brown midrib 3 mutation in corn silage on productivity of dairy cows fed two concentrations of dietary neutral detergent fiber: 1. Feeding behavior and nutrient utilization. J Dairy Sci.83 (6), 1333-1341, (2000). B) Oba, M. & Allen, M. S. Effects of brown midrib 3 mutation in corn silage on productivity of dairy cows fed two concentrations of dietary neutral detergent fiber: 3. Digestibility and microbial efficiency. J Dairy Sci.83 (6), 1350-1358, (2000).
A) Oba, M. & Allen, M. S. Effects of corn grain conservation method on feeding behavior and productivity of lactating dairy cows at two dietary starch concentrations. J Dairy Sci.86 (1), 174-183, (2003). B) Oba, M. & Allen, M. S. Effects of diet fermentability on efficiency of microbial nitrogen production in lactating dairy cows. J Dairy Sci.86 (1), 195-207, (2003).
A) Preynat, A. et al. Effects of supplements of folic acid, vitamin B12, and rumen-protected methionine on whole body metabolism of methionine and glucose in lactating dairy cows. J Dairy Sci.92 (2), 677-689, (2009). B) Preynat, A. et al. Influence of methionine supply on the response of lactational performance of dairy cows to supplementary folic acid and vitamin B121. Journal of Dairy Science. 92 (4), 1685-1695, (2009)
A) Reynal, S. M. & Broderick, G. A. Effect of dietary level of rumen-degraded protein on production and nitrogen metabolism in lactating dairy cows. J Dairy Sci.88 (11), 4045-4064, (2005). B) Reynal, S. M., Broderick, G. A. & Bearzi, C. Comparison of Four Markers for Quantifying Microbial Protein Flow from the Rumen of Lactating Dairy Cows. Journal of Dairy Science. 88 (11), 4065-4082, (2005).
A) Reynal, S. M. & Broderick, G. A. Effects of feeding dairy cows protein supplements of varying ruminal degradability. J Dairy Sci.86 (3), 835-843, (2003). B) Reynal, S. M., Broderick, G. A., Ahvenj<e4>rvi, S. & Huhtanen, P. Effect of Feeding Protein Supplements of Differing Degradability on Omasal Flow of Microbial and Undegraded Protein. Journal of Dairy Science. 86 (4), 1292-1305, (2003).
A) Robinson, P. H., Veira, D. M. & Ivan, M. Influence of supplemental protein quality on rumen fermentation, rumen microbial yield, forestomach digestion, and intestinal amino acid flow in late lactation Holstein cows. Canadian Journal of Animal Science. 78 (1), 95-105, (1998). B) Robinson, P. H., Fadel, J. G. & Ivan, M. Critical evaluation of diaminopimelic acid and ribonucleic acid as markers to estimate rumen pools and duodenal flows of bacterial and protozoal nitrogen. Canadian Journal of Animal Science. 76 (4), 587-597, (1996).
A) Taylor, C. C. & Allen, M. S. Corn grain endosperm type and brown midrib 3 corn silage: ruminal fermentation and N partitioning in lactating cows. J Dairy Sci.88 (4), 1434-1442, (2005). B) Taylor, C. C. & Allen, M. S. Corn grain endosperm type and brown midrib 3 corn silage: feeding behavior and milk yield of lactating cows. J Dairy Sci.88 (4), 1425-1433, (2005).
A) Vanhatalo, A., Kuoppala, K., Ahvenjarvi, S. & Rinne, M. Effects of feeding grass or red clover silage cut at two maturity stages in dairy cows. 1. Nitrogen metabolism and supply of amino acids. J Dairy Sci.92 (11), 5620-5633, (2009). B) Kuoppala, K., Ahvenjarvi, S., Rinne, M. & Vanhatalo, A. Effects of feeding grass or red clover silage cut at two maturity stages in dairy cows. 2. Dry matter intake and cell wall digestion kinetics. J Dairy Sci.92 (11), 5634-5644, (2009).
A) Voelker, J. A. & Allen, M. S. Pelleted beet pulp substituted for high-moisture corn: 1. Effects on feed intake, chewing behavior, and milk production of lactating dairy cows. J Dairy Sci.86 (11), 3542-3552, (2003). B) Voelker, J. A. & Allen, M. S. Pelleted Beet Pulp Substituted for High-Moisture Corn: 3. Effects on Ruminal Fermentation, pH, and Microbial Protein Efficiency in Lactating Dairy Cows. Journal of Dairy Science. 86 (11), 3562-3570, (2003).
A) Wu, Z., Ohajuruka, O. A. & Palmquist, D. L. Ruminal Synthesis, Biohydrogenation, and Digestibility of Fatty Acids by Dairy Cows1. Journal of Dairy Science. 74 (9), 3025-3034, (1991). B) Ohajuruka, O. A., Wu, Z. & Palmquist, D. L. Ruminal Metabolism, Fiber, and Protein Digestion by Lactating Cows Fed Calcium Soap or Animal-Vegetable Fat1. Journal of Dairy Science. 74 (8), 2601-2609, (1991)
A. Collin, J. van Milgen, S. Dubois, J. Noblet. 2001. JAS. 79:1849-1857
A.A. Mendes, S.E. Watkins, J.A. England, E.A. Saleh, A.L. Waldroup, P.W. Waldroup. 1997. Poult. Sci. 76:472-481
A.Collin, J. van Milgen, S. Dubois, J. Noblet. 2001. B. J. Nut. 86:63-70
Ahvenjarvi, S., Joki-Tokola, E., Vanhatalo, A., Jaakkola, S. & Huhtanen, P. Effects of replacing grass silage with barley silage in dairy cow diets. J Dairy Sci.89 (5), 1678-1687, (2006).
Ahvenjarvi, S., Vanhatalo, A., Huhtanen, P. & Varvikko, T. Determination of reticulo-rumen and whole-stomach digestion in lactating cows by omasal canal or duodenal sampling. Br J Nutr. 83 (1), 67-77, (2000).
Ahvenjarvi, S., Vanhatalo, A., Huhtanen, P. & Varvikko, T. Effects of Supplementation of a Grass Silage and Barley Diet with Urea, Rapeseed Meal and Heat-moisture-treated Rapeseed Cake on Omasal Digesta Flow and Milk Production in Lactating Dairy Cows. Acta Agriculturae Scandinavica, Section A <U+0097> Animal Science.49 (3), 179-189, (1999).
Al-Dehneh, A. et al. Incorporation of recycled urea-N into ruminal bacteria flowing to the small intestine of dairy cows fed a high-grain or high-forage diet. Animal Feed Science and Technology. 68 (3/4), 327-338, (1997).
Aldrich, Muller, Varga, and Griel (1993) J Dairy Sci 76:1091-1105
Allen, M. S. & Ying, Y. Effects of Saccharomyces cerevisiae fermentation product on ruminal starch digestion are dependent upon dry matter intake for lactating cows. J Dairy Sci. 95 (11), 6591-6605, (2012).
Andrae et al. JAS. 78. 2257-2262
Appuhamy, J. A., Knapp, J. R., Becvar, O., Escobar, J. & Hanigan, M. D. Effects of jugular-infused lysine, methionine, and branched-chain amino acids on milk protein synthesis in high-producing dairy cows. J Dairy Sci. 94 (4), 1952-1960, (2011).
Ardalan, M., Dehghan-Banadaky, M. & Rezayazdi, K. Milk yield persistency and its relationship with health problems in Holstein dairy cows supplemented with different levels of ruminally protected methionine and choline. Archiv Tierzucht. 53 (3), 266-276, (2010).
Arias et al. 2012 J. Anim. Sci. 2012.90:3574–3583
Arias et al. 2013 J. Anim. Sci. 2013.91:4366–4373
Arieli, Mabjeesh, Tagari, Bruckental, and Zamwell (1993). Livestock Production Science, 35: 283-292
Armentano, Harrington, Polan, Moe, Herbein, and Umstadt 1986 J Dairy Sci 69:2124-2133
Armentano, L. E., Bertics, S. J. & Ducharme, G. A. Response of lactating cows to methionine or methionine plus lysine added to high protein diets based on alfalfa and heated soybeans. J Dairy Sci. 80 (6), 1194-1199, (1997).
Arriola Apelo, S. I. et al. Effects of reduced dietary protein and supplemental rumen-protected essential amino acids on the nitrogen efficiency of dairy cows. J Dairy Sci. 97 (9), 5688-5699, (2014).
B.A. Becker, C.D. Knight, F.C. Buonomo, G.W. Jesses, H.B. Hendrick, C.A. Baile. 1992. JAS . 70:2732-2740
B.G. Kim, M.D. Lindermann, G.L. Cromwell. 2009. JAS. 87:1695-1704
B.J. Kerr, J.T. Yen, J.A. Nienaber, R.A. Easter. 2003. JAS. 81:1998-2007
Bailey, E. A., et al. Journal of animal science 90.10 (2012): 3505-3514.
Bailey, E. A., et al.Journal of animal science 90.10 (2012): 3492-3504.
Batista, E. D., et al. Journal of animal science 94.1 (2016): 201-216.
Beauchemin, K. A., Yang, W. Z. & Rode, L. M. Effects of grain source and enzyme additive on site and extent of nutrient digestion in dairy cows. J Dairy Sci.82 (2), 378-390, (1999).
Benchaar et al., 1994. JDS 77: 1360-1371
Benchaar, Bayourthe, Moncoulon, and Vernay (1991).Reproduction Nutrition Development, EDP Sciences, 31 (6): 655-665
Benchaar, Moncoulon, Bayourthe, and Vernay (1994). J. Anim. Sci. 72:492-501
Benefield, B. C., Patton, R. A., Stevenson, M. J. & Overton, T. R. Evaluation of rumen-protected methionine sources and period length on performance of lactating dairy cows within Latin squares. J Dairy Sci. 92 (9), 4448-4455, (2009).
Bengochea et al. 2005 J. Anim. Sci. 2005. 83:2815–2825
Bernard, J. K. et al. Effect of supplemental L-lysine-HCL and corn source on rumen fermentation and amino acid flow to the small intestine. J Dairy Sci.87 (2), 399-405, (2004).
Berthiaume et al. 2006. 84. 2168-2177
Berthiaume, R. et al. Effect of ruminally protected methionine on splanchnic metabolism of amino acids in lactating dairy cows. J Dairy Sci. 89 (5), 1621-1634, (2006).
Berthiaume, R., Dubreuil, P., Stevenson, M., McBride, B. W. & Lapierre, H. Intestinal Disappearance and Mesenteric and Portal Appearance of Amino Acids in Dairy Cows Fed Ruminally Protected Methionine1. Journal of Dairy Science.84 (1), 194-203, (2001).
Blauwiekel et al., 1997. JDS 80: 1358-1365
Blum, J. W., Bruckmaier, R. M. & Jans, F. Rumen-protected methionine fed to dairy cows: bioavailability and effects on plasma amino acid pattern and plasma metabolite and insulin concentrations. J Dairy Sci. 82 (9), 1991-1998, (1999).
Bock et al. 1991. J. Anim. Sci. 69. 2211-2224
Boerman, J. P., de Souza, J. & Lock, A. L. Milk production and nutrient digestibility responses to increasing levels of stearic acid supplementation of dairy cows. J Dairy Sci. 100 (4), 2729-2738, (2017).
Brake, D. W., E. C. Titgemeyer, and M. L. Jones. Journal of animal physiology and animal nutrition 95.4 (2011): 409-416.
Brake, D. W., et al. Journal of Animal science 88.8 (2010): 2729-2740.
Brito, A. F. & Broderick, G. A. Effects of different protein supplements on milk production and nutrient utilization in lactating dairy cows. J Dairy Sci.90 (4), 1816-1827, (2007).
Brito, A. F., Broderick, G. A. & Reynal, S. M. Effects of different protein supplements on omasal nutrient flow and microbial protein synthesis in lactating dairy cows. J Dairy Sci.90 (4), 1828-1841, (2007).
Brito, A. F., Broderick, G. A., Olmos Colmenero, J. J. & Reynal, S. M. Effects of feeding formate-treated alfalfa silage or red clover silage on omasal nutrient flow and microbial protein synthesis in lactating dairy cows. J Dairy Sci.90 (3), 1392-1404, (2007).
Broderick, G. A. & Muck, R. E. Effect of alfalfa silage storage structure and rumen-protected methionine on production in lactating dairy cows. J Dairy Sci.92 (3), 1281-1289, (2009).
Broderick, G. A. & Reynal, S. M. Effect of source of rumen-degraded protein on production and ruminal metabolism in lactating dairy cows1. Journal of Dairy Science. 92 (6), 2822-2834, (2009).
Broderick, G. A., Brito, A. F. & Olmos Colmenero, J. J. Effects of feeding formate-treated alfalfa silage or red clover silage on the production of lactating dairy cows. J Dairy Sci.90 (3), 1378-1391, (2007).
Broderick, G. A., Luchini, N. D., Reynal, S. M., Varga, G. A. & Ishler, V. A. Effect on production of replacing dietary starch with sucrose in lactating dairy cows. J Dairy Sci.91 (12), 4801-4810, (2008).
Broderick, G. A., Stevenson, M. J. & Patton, R. A. Effect of dietary protein concentration and degradability on response to rumen-protected methionine in lactating dairy cows. J Dairy Sci.92 (6), 2719-2728, (2009).
Broderick, G. A., Stevenson, M. J., Patton, R. A., Lobos, N. E. & Olmos Colmenero, J. J. Effect of supplementing rumen-protected methionine on production and nitrogen excretion in lactating dairy cows. J Dairy Sci.91 (3), 1092-1102, (2008).
Buttrey et al. 2013. J. Anim. Sci. 91. 1850-1865
C. Tadtiyanant, J.J. Lyons, J.M. Vanderpopuliere. 1991. Poult. Sci. 70:44-52
C.W. Holmes. 1971. Anim. Prod. 13:521-527
C.W. Holmes. 1973. Anim. Prod. 1:117-133
Callison, S. L., Firkins, J. L., Eastridge, M. L. & Hull, B. L. Site of nutrient digestion by dairy cows fed corn of different particle sizes or steam-rolled. J Dairy Sci.84 (6), 1458-1467, (2001).
Calsamiglia et al., 1995. JDS 78: 1999-2007
Cameron et al., 1991. JDS 74: 1321-1336
Castillo-Lopez, E. et al. Ration formulations containing reduced-fat dried distillers grains with solubles and their effect on lactation performance, rumen fermentation, and intestinal flow of microbial nitrogen in Holstein cows. J Dairy Sci. 97 (3), 1578-1593, (2014).
Cecava et al. 1991. J. Anim. Sci. 69. 2230-2243
Ceconi et al. 2015 J. Anim. Sci. 2015.93:357–369
Ceconi et al. 2015 J. Anim. Sci. 2015.93:4058–4069
Chan et al., 1997. JDS 80: 152-159
Chapple et al. 2015 J. Anim. Sci. 2015.93:4002–4011
Chen, Z. H., Broderick, G. A., Luchini, N. D., Sloan, B. K. & Devillard, E. Effect of feeding different sources of rumen-protected methionine on milk production and N-utilization in lactating dairy cows. J Dairy Sci. 94 (4), 1978-1988, (2011).
Cherdthong et al. 2014 . Ainmal Feed Science and Technology 198:151-157
Chibisa, G. E. & Mutsvangwa, T. Effects of feeding wheat or corn-wheat dried distillers grains with solubles in low- or high-crude protein diets on ruminal function, omasal nutrient flows, urea-N recycling, and performance in cows. J Dairy Sci.96 (10), 6550-6563, (2013).
Chibisa, G. E., Christensen, D. A. & Mutsvangwa, T. Effects of replacing canola meal as the major protein source with wheat dried distillers grains with solubles on ruminal function, microbial protein synthesis, omasal flow, and milk production in cows. J Dairy Sci.95 (2), 824-841, (2012).
Chilliard, Y. & Doreau, M. Influence of supplementary fish oil and rumen-protected methionine on milk yield and composition in dairy cows. J Dairy Res. 64 (2), 173-179, (1997).
Choi, C. W., Ahvenj<e4>rvi, S., Vanhatalo, A., Toivonen, V. & Huhtanen, P. Quantitation of the flow of soluble non-ammonia nitrogen entering the omasal canal of dairy cows fed grass silage based diets. Animal Feed Science and Technology.96 (3), 203-220, (2002).
Choi, C. W., Vanhatalo, A. & Huhtanen, P. Concentration and estimated flow of soluble non-ammonia nitrogen entering the omasum of dairy cows as influenced by different protein supplements. Agricultural and Food Science. 11 (2), 79-91, (2002).
Choi, C. W., Vanhatalo, A., Ahvenj<e4>rvi, S. & Huhtanen, P. Effects of several protein supplements on flow of soluble non-ammonia nitrogen from the forestomach and milk production in dairy cows. Animal Feed Science and Technology.102 (1), 15-33, (2002).
Chow, J. M., DePeters, E. J. & Baldwin, R. L. Effect of rumen-protected methionine and lysine on casein in milk when diets high in fat or concentrate are fed. J Dairy Sci. 73 (4), 1051-1061, (1990).
Christensen et al., 1993. JDS 76: 3497-3513
Christensen et al., 1996. JDS 79: 1410-1424
Chung et al. 2013 J. Anim. Sci. 2013.91:4861–4874
Cole et al. 2006. J. Anim. Sci. 84. 3421-3432
Cranston et al. 2006. J. Anim. Sci. 84. 2186-2199
Crawford et al. 2008 J. Anim. Sci. 2008. 86:2998–3013
Crocker, L. M. et al. Influence of processed corn grain in diets of dairy cows on digestion of nutrients and milk composition. J Dairy Sci.81 (9), 2394-2407, (1998).
Cunningham et al., 1994. JDS 77: 3666-3675
Cunningham et al., 1996. JDS 79: 620
Cunningham, Cecava, and Johnson (1993) J Dairy Sci 76: 3523-3535
Cunningham, Cecava, and Johnson 1994 J Dairy Sci 77:3666-3675
D. Renaudeau, E. Huc, J. Noblet. 2007. JAS. 85:779-790
D. Rinaldo, J Le Dividich, J. Noblet. 2000. Livestock Prod. Sci. 66:228-234
D. Rinaldo, J. LeDividich. 1991. Livestock Prod. Sci. 29:61-75
D.E. Brown, R.R. Hacker, G.J. King. 1976. CJAS. 56:365-371
D.E. Spiers, J.N. Spain, J.D. Sampson, R.P. Rhoads. 2004. J. Therm. Biol. 29:759-764
D.J. Schingoethe, K.N. Linke, K.F. Kalscheur, A.R. Hippen, D.R. Rennich, I. Yoon. 2004. J. Dairy Sci. 87:4178-4181
D.L Franco-Jimenez, S.E. Scheideler, R.J. Kittok, T.M. Brown-Brandl, L.R. Robeson, H. Taira, M.M. Beck. 2007. J. Appl. Poult. Res.
D.L. Ingram, K.F. Legge. 1974. Comp. Biochem. Phisiol. 48A:573-581
D.M. Kapp, R.R. Grummer. 1990. J. Dairy Sci. 74:2573-2579
D.S. Lough, D.L. Beede, C.J. Wilcox. 1990. J. Dairy Sci. 73:325-332
Davidson, S. et al. Supplementing limited methionine diets with rumen-protected methionine, betaine, and choline in early lactation Holstein cows. J Dairy Sci. 91 (4), 1552-1559, (2008).
Davies, K. L., J. J. McKinnon, and T. Mutsvangwa. Canadian Journal of Animal Science 93.1 (2013): 123-136.
Denman and McSweeney, 2006. FEMS Microbiol Ecol. 58:572-582
Dewhurst, R. J. et al. Comparison of grass and legume silages for milk production. 2. In vivo and in sacco evaluations of rumen function. J Dairy Sci.86 (8), 2612-2621, (2003).
Dewhurst, R. J., Fisher, W. J., Tweed, J. K. & Wilkins, R. J. Comparison of grass and legume silages for milk production. 1. Production responses with different levels of concentrate. J Dairy Sci.86 (8), 2598-2611, (2003).
Doelman, J. et al. Essential amino acid infusions stimulate mammary expression of eukaryotic initiation factor 2Bepsilon but milk protein yield is not increased during an imbalance. J Dairy Sci. 98 (7), 4499-4508, (2015).
Domby et al. 2014 J. Anim. Sci. 2014.92:1133–1143
Donkin, S. S., Varga, G. A., Sweeney, T. F. & Muller, L. D. Rumen-protected methionine and lysine: effects on animal performance, milk protein yield, and physiological measures. J Dairy Sci. 72 (6), 1484-1491, (1989).
Doreau, LeGay, and Bauchart (1991) J Dairy Sci 74:223J-2242
Drackley, J. K. & Elliott, J. P. Milk composition, ruminal characteristics, and nutrient utilization in dairy cows fed partially hydrogenated tallow. J Dairy Sci. 76 (1), 183-196, (1993).
Drackley, J. K., Grum, D. E., McCoy, G. C. & Klusmeyer, T. H. Comparison of three methods for incorporation of liquid fat into diets for lactating dairy cows. J Dairy Sci. 77 (5), 1386-1398, (1994).
E.W. Seymour, V.C. Speer, V.W. Hays, D.W. Mangold, T.E. Hazen. 1964. JAS. 23:375-379
Elliott, J. P., Drackley, J. K. & Weigel, D. J. Digestibility and effects of hydrogenated palm fatty acid distillate in lactating dairy cows. J Dairy Sci. 79 (6), 1031-1039, (1996).
Enjalbert, F., Nicot, M. C., Bayourthe, C., Vernay, M. & Moncoulon, R. Effects of dietary calcium soaps of unsaturated fatty acids on digestion, milk composition and physical properties of butter. J Dairy Res. 64 (2), 181-195, (1997).
Erasmus et al.,1994 J Dairy Sci 77:3655-3665
Erasmus, Botha, and Kistner (1992) J Dairy Sci 75:3056-3065
Espindola et al., 1997. JDS 80: 1160-1171
F. Liu, J. Yin, M. Du, P. Yan, J. Xu, X. Zhu, J. Yu. 2009. JAS. 87:1941-1949
F.M. Mitlohner, J.L. Morrow, J.W. Dailey, S.C. Wilson, M.L. Galyean, M.F. Miller, J.J. McGlone. 2001. J. Anim. Scie. 79:2327-2335
F.M. Mitlohner, M.L. Galyean, J.J. McGlone. 2002. J. Anim. Sci. 80:2043-2050
Faciola, A. P. & Broderick, G. A. Effects of feeding lauric acid or coconut oil on ruminal protozoa numbers, fermentation pattern, digestion, omasal nutrient flow, and milk production in dairy cows. J Dairy Sci.97 (8), 5088-5100, (2014).
Fanchone, A. et al. Effects of nitrogen underfeeding and energy source on nitrogen ruminal metabolism, digestion, and nitrogen partitioning in dairy cows. J Anim Sci.91 (2), 895-906, (2013).
Feng et al. 1995 J. Anim. Sci. 1995. 73:3476–3484
Feng, Hoover, Miller, and Blauwiekel (1993) J Dairy Sci 76:1324-1333
Foley, A. E. et al. Effect of barley and its amylopectin content on ruminal fermentation and nitrogen utilization in lactating dairy cows. J Dairy Sci. 89 (11), 4321-4335, (2006).
Fredin, S. M., Ferraretto, L. F., Akins, M. S., Bertics, S. J. & Shaver, R. D. Effects of corn-based diet starch content and corn particle size on lactation performance, digestibility, and bacterial protein flow in dairy cows. J Dairy Sci. 98 (1), 541-553, (2015).
G. Shwartz, M.L. Rhoads, M.J. VanBaale, R.P. Rhoads, L.H. Baumgard. 2008. J. Dairy Sci. 92:935-942
G.A. Wieman, J.B. Campbell, J.A. Deshazer, I.L. Berry. 1992. Vet. Ent. 85:1835-1842
G.P. Lofgreen and W.N. Garrett, 1968. Journal of Animal Science v.27, p. 793-806
Garcia, S. C., Santini, F. J. & Elizalde, J. C. Sites of digestion and bacterial protein synthesis in dairy heifers fed fresh oats with or without corn or barley grain. J Dairy Sci.83 (4), 746-755, (2000).
Giallongo, F. et al. Effects of rumen-protected methionine, lysine, and histidine on lactation performance of dairy cows. J Dairy Sci. 99 (6), 4437-4452, (2016).
Gilbery et al. 2006. J. Anim. Sci. 84. 1468-148
Gilbery et al. 2006. J. Anim. Sci. 84. 1468-156
Girard, C. L., Lapierre, H., Matte, J. J. & Lobley, G. E. Effects of dietary supplements of folic acid and rumen-protected methionine on lactational performance and folate metabolism of dairy cows. J Dairy Sci. 88 (2), 660-670, (2005).
Gleghorn et al. 2004. J. Anim. Sci. 2705-2717
Gonzalez-Ronquillo, M., Balcells, J., Belenguer, A., Castrillo, C. & Mota, M. A comparison of purine derivatives excretion with conventional methods as indices of microbial yield in dairy cows. J Dairy Sci.87 (7), 2211-2221, (2004).
Greenfield, T. L., Baldwin, R. L. t., Erdman, R. A. & McLeod, K. R. Ruminal fermentation and intestinal flow of nutrients by lactating cows consuming brown midrib corn silages. J Dairy Sci. 84 (11), 2469-2477, (2001).
Gromez-Alarcon et al. 1990 J Dairy Sci 73:703-710
Guinard, J. & Rulquin, H. Effects of graded amounts of duodenal infusions of methionine on the mammary uptake of major milk precursors in dairy cows. J Dairy Sci. 78 (10), 2196-2207, (1995).
Górka et al. 2015 J. Anim. Sci. 2015.93:4891–4902
H. Xin, J.A. DeShazer. 1991. Trans ASABE. 34(6):2533-2540
H.A. Baziz, P.A. Geraert, J.C.F. Padilha, S. Guillaumin. 1996. Poult. Sci.
H.D. Johnson, R. Li, W. Manalu, K.J. Spencer-Johnson. 1991. J. Dairy Sci. 74:1250-1262
H.M. White, B.T. Richert, A.P. Schinckel, J.R. Burgess, S.S. Donkin, M.A. Latour. 2008. JAS. 86:1789-1798
H.R. Kutlu, J.M. Forbes. 1993. Livestock Prod. Sci. 36:335-350
Hales et al. 2014. J. Anim. Sci. 91. 264-271
Hales et al. 2015. J. Anim. Sci. 93:4995–5005
Hales et al. 2013 J. Anim. Sci. 2013.91:4277–4289
Halmemies-Beauchet-Filleau, A. et al. Effect of replacing grass silage with red clover silage on nutrient digestion, nitrogen metabolism, and milk fat composition in lactating cows fed diets containing a 60:40 forage-to-concentrate ratio. J Dairy Sci.97 (6), 3761-3776, (2014).
Harvatine, D. I., Firkins, J. L. & Eastridge, M. L. Whole Linted Cottonseed as a Forage Substitute Fed with Ground or Steam-flaked Corn: Digestibility and Performance1,2. Journal of Dairy Science.85 (8), 1976-1987, (2002).
Harvatine, K. J. & Allen, M. S. Effects of fatty acid supplements on ruminal and total tract nutrient digestion in lactating dairy cows. J Dairy Sci.89 (3), 1092-1103, (2006).
He et al 2015. Livestock Science 176:104-110
He et al. 2014 J. Anim. Sci. 2014.92:3978–3987
He et al. 2015 J. Anim. Sci. 2015.93:1218–1228
Herrera-Saldana, Gomez-Alacron, Torabi, and Huber (1990) J Dairy Sci 73: 142-148
Hill et al. 1996. J. Anim. Sci. 74. 1728-1735
Holden et al., 1994. JDS 77: 2580-2594
Horner et al., (1988) JDS 71:1239
Hristov et al. 2006. J. Anim. Sci.
Hristov, A. N. & Ropp, J. K. Effect of dietary carbohydrate composition and availability on utilization of ruminal ammonia nitrogen for milk protein synthesis in dairy cows. J Dairy Sci.86 (7), 2416-2427, (2003).
Hristov, A. N. et al. Effect of carbohydrate source on ammonia utilization in lactating dairy cows. J Anim Sci. 83 (2), 408-421, (2005).
Hristov, A. N. et al. Effect of exogenous polysaccharide-degrading enzyme preparations on ruminal fermentation and digestibility of nutrients in dairy cows. Animal Feed Science and Technology. 145 (1/4), 182-193, (2008).
Hristov, A. N., Etter, R. P., Ropp, J. K. & Grandeen, K. L. Effect of dietary crude protein level and degradability on ruminal fermentation and nitrogen utilization in lactating dairy cows1. Journal of Animal Science.82 (11), 3219-3229, (2004).
Hristov, A. N., Grandeen, K. L., Ropp, J. K. & McGuire, M. A. Effect of sodium laurate on ruminal fermentation and utilization of ruminal ammonia nitrogen for milk protein synthesis in dairy cows. J Dairy Sci. 87 (6), 1820-1831, (2004).
Hutchinson et al. 2006. J. Anim. Sci.
Huyen et al. 2012. Animal Feed Science and Technologgy 175.1:8-15
I. Zulkifli, N. Abdullah, N. Mohd Axrin, Y.W. Ho. 2000. Brit. Poult. Sci. 41:593-597
Ipharraguerre, I. R., Clark, J. H. & Freeman, D. E. Rumen Fermentation and Intestinal Supply of Nutrients in Dairy Cows Fed Rumen-Protected Soy Products. Journal of Dairy Science. 88 (8), 2879-2892, (2005).
Ipharraguerre, I. R., Clark, J. H. & Freeman, D. E. Varying protein and starch in the diet of dairy cows. I. Effects on ruminal fermentation and intestinal supply of nutrients. J Dairy Sci.88 (7), 2537-2555, (2005).
Ipharraguerre, I. R., Reynal, S. M., Lineiro, M., Broderick, G. A. & Clark, J. H. A comparison of sampling sites, digesta and microbial markers, and microbial references for assessing the postruminal supply of nutrients in dairy cows. J Dairy Sci. 90 (4), 1904-1919, (2007).
Ipharraguerre, I. R., Shabi, Z., Clark, J. H. & Freeman, D. E. Ruminal fermentation and nutrient digestion by dairy cows fed varying amounts of soyhulls as a replacement for corn grain. J Dairy Sci.85 (11), 2890-2904, (2002).
J. C. Hse, C.Y. Lin, P.W. Shyg Chiou. 1998. Anim. Feed Sci. Tech. 74:289-299
J. Heo, H.G. Kattesh, M.P. Roberts, J.L. Morrow, J.W. Dailey, A.M. Saxton. 2005. JAS. 83:208-215
J. Kanjanapruthipong, N. Homwong, N. Buatong. 2010. J. Dairy Sci. 93:2589-2597
J. Lopez, G.W. Jesse, B.A. Becker, M.R. Ellersieck. 1991. JAS. 69:1843-1849
J. Lopez, G.W. Jesse, B.A. Becker, M.R. Ellersieck. 1991. JAS. 89:1850-1855
J.A. Nienaber, G.L. Hahn, H.G. Klemoke, B.A. Becker, G. Blecha. 1989. J. Therm. Biol
J.B. Gaughan, T.L. Mader, D. Savage, B.A. Young. 1996. Proc. Aust. Soc. Anim. Prod.
J.B. Wheelock, R.P. Rhoads, M.J. VanBaale, S.R. Sanders, L.H. Baumgard. 2010. J. Dairy Sci. 93:644-655
J.D. Spencer, A.M. Gaines, E.P. Berg, G.I. Allee. 2005. JAS. 83:243-254
J.F Patience, J.F Umboh, R.K Chaplin, C.M. Nyachoti. 2005. Anim. Prod. Sci.
J.J.R. Feedes, J.A. DeShazer. 1988. Trans ASABE 31(4):1203-1210
J.P. Trout, L.R. McDowell, P.J. Hansen. 1998. J. Dairy Sci. 91:1244-1250
J.R. Bartlett, M.O. smith. 2003. Poult. Sci. 82:1580-1588
J.S. McKee, P.C. Harrison, G.L. Riskowski. 1997. Poult. Sci. 76:1278-1286
J.S. Sands, M.O. Smith. 1999. J. Appl. Poult. Res. 8:280-287
J.W. West, K.D. Haydon, B.G. Mullinx, T.G. Sandifer. 1992. J. Dairy Sci. 75:2776-2786
Jami and Mizrahi. 2012. PLoS ONE. 7:e33306
Jenkins et al. 2011. J. Anim. Sci. 89. 1167-1172
Jenkins, T. C. & Jenny, B. F. Effect of hydrogenated fat on feed intake, nutrient digestion, and lactation performance of dairy cows. J Dairy Sci. 72 (9), 2316-2324, (1989).
Jiang et al. 2017. J Dairy Sci. 100:325-342
Jones-Endsley, J. M., Cecava, M. J. & Johnson, T. R. Effects of dietary supplementation on nutrient digestion and the milk yield of intensively grazed lactating dairy cows. J Dairy Sci.80 (12), 3283-3292, (1997).
Jordan et al. 2006. J. Anim. Sci. 84. 162-170
Joy et al., 1997. JDS 80: 2087-2097
K. Koh, M.G. Macleod. 1999. B. Poult. Sci. 40:511-516
K. Manner, K. Want. 1991. Poult. Sci
K.D. Haydon, J.W. West, M.N. McCarter. 1990. JAS. 68:2400-2406
K.H. Ominski, A.D. Kennedy, K.M. Wittenberg, S.A. Moshtaghi Nia. 2002. J. Dairy Sci. 85:730-737
K.W. Koelkebeck, P.C. Harrison, R. Madindou. 1993. Poult. Sci 72:1800-1803
Kalscheur et al., 1997. JDS 80: 2104-2114
Kalscheur et al., 1997. JDS 80: 2115-2126
Kammes, K. L. & Allen, M. S. Nutrient demand interacts with forage family to affect digestion responses in dairy cows. J Dairy Sci. 95 (6), 3269-3287, (2012).
Kammes, K. L. & Allen, M. S. Nutrient demand interacts with grass maturity to affect milk fat concentration and digestion responses in dairy cows. J Dairy Sci. 95 (9), 5133-5148, (2012).
Kammes, K. L. & Allen, M. S. Nutrient demand interacts with grass particle length to affect digestion responses and chewing activity in dairy cows. J Dairy Sci. 95 (2), 807-823, (2012).
Kammes, K. L., Ying, Y. & Allen, M. S. Nutrient demand interacts with legume maturity to affect rumen pool sizes in dairy cows. J Dairy Sci. 95 (5), 2632-2647, (2012).
Kammes, K. L., Ying, Y. & Allen, M. S. Nutrient demand interacts with legume particle length to affect digestion responses and rumen pool sizes in dairy cows. J Dairy Sci. 95 (5), 2616-2631, (2012).
Khorasani et al., 1996. JDS 79: 862-872
King, Huber, Sadik, Bergen, Grant, and King 1990 J Daily Sci 73:3208--3216
Klieve et al. 2003., J Appl Microbiol. 95:621-630
Klusmeyer et al., 1990. JDS 73: 3526-3537
Klusmeyer et al., 1991. JDS 74: 2206-2219
Klusmeyer et al., 1991. JDS 74: 2220-2232
Knowlton, K. F., Glenn, B. P. & Erdman, R. A. Performance, ruminal fermentation, and site of starch digestion in early lactation cows fed corn grain harvested and processed differently. J Dairy Sci.81 (7), 1972-1984, (1998).
Koenig and Beauchemin. 2013. J. Anim. Sci. 91. 2295-2309
Koenig et al. 2003. J. Anim. Sci. 81. 1057-1067
Koenig et al. 2004. Canadian journal of animal science 84.3 (2004): 481-490
Koike and Kobayashi et al., 2001. FEMS Microbiol Lett. 204:361-366
Korhonen, M., Vanhatalo, A. & Huhtanen, P. Effect of protein source on amino acid supply, milk production, and metabolism of plasma nutrients in dairy cows fed grass silage. J Dairy Sci.85 (12), 3336-3351, (2002).
Korhonen, M., Vanhatalo, A. & Huhtanen, P. Evaluation of isoleucine, leucine, and valine as a second-limiting amino acid for milk production in dairy cows fed grass silage diet. Journal of Dairy Science. 85 (6), 1533-1545, (2002).
Kowalski, Z. M., Pisulewski, P. M. & G<f6>rg<fc>l<fc>, M. Effects of protected methionine and variable energy supply on lactational responses in dairy cows fed grass silage-based diets. Journal of Animal and Feed Sciences. 12 (3), 451-464, (2003).
Kowalski, Z. M., Pisulewski, P. M. & Spanghero, M. Effects of calcium soaps of rapeseed fatty acids and protected methionine on milk yield and composition in dairy cows. J Dairy Res. 66 (4), 475-487, (1999).
Kreikemeier et al. 1990. J. Anim. Sci. 68. 2130-2141
Krizsan, S. J., Broderick, G. A., Promkot, C. & Colombini, S. Effects of alfalfa silage storage structure and roasting corn on ruminal digestion and microbial CP synthesis in lactating dairy cows. Animal.6 (4), 624-632, (2012).
Krober, T. F., Kreuzer, M., Senn, M., Langhans, W. & Sutter, F. Lactational and metabolic effects in cows of lysine and methionine added to a ration deficient according to the I.N.R.A. method. Arch Tierernahr. 53 (4), 375-394, (2000).
Kudrna, V., Illek, J., Marounek, M. & Ngoc, A. N. Feeding ruminally protected methionine to pre- and postpartum dairy cows: effect on milk performance, milk composition and blood parameters. Czech Journal of Animal Science. 54 (9), 395-402, (2009).
Kung, Huber, and Satter (1983)J Dairy Sci 66:1863--1872
Kuoppala, K., Rinne, M., Ahvenjarvi, S., Nousiainen, J. & Huhtanen, P. The effect of harvesting strategy of grass silage on digestion and nutrient supply in dairy cows. J Dairy Sci.93 (7), 3253-3263, (2010).
L. Le Bellego, J. van Milgen, J. Noblet. 2002. JAS. 80:691-701
L. Lefaucheur, J. Le Dividish, J. Mourot, G. Monin, P. Ecolan, D. Krauss. 1991. JAS. 69:2844-2854
L. Wang, X.L. Piao, S.W. Kim, X.S. Piao, Y.B. Shen, H.S. Lee. 2008. Poult. Sci. 87:1287-1294
L.B. Celik, A. Tekeli, O. Ozturkcan. 2004. J. Anim. Physiol. A. Anim. Nutr. 88:229-233
L.C. Hsia, M.F. Fuller, F.K. Koh. 1974. Trop. Asian. Hth. Prod. 6:183-187
L.E. Maust, R.E. McDowell, N.W. Hooven. 1972. J. Dairy Sci.
L.H. Baumgard, J.B. Wheelock, S.R. Sanders, C.E. Moore, H.B. Green, M.R. Waldron, R.P. Rhoads. 2011. J. Dairy Sci. 94:5620-5633
Ladely et al. 1995. J. Anim. Sci. 73. 360-364
Lara, A. et al. Milk production in Holstein cows supplemented with different levels of ruminally protected methionine. Livestock Science. 105 (1/3), 105-108, (2006).
Lardy et al. 2004 J. Anim. Sci. 2004. 82:3662–3668
Larrain et al. 2009. J. Anim. Sci. 87. 2089-2095
Leonardi, C., Stevenson, M. & Armentano, L. E. Effect of two levels of crude protein and methionine supplementation on performance of dairy cows. J Dairy Sci. 86 (12), 4033-4042, (2003).
Leupp et al. 2009 J. Anim. Sci. 2009. 87:2906–2912
Li et al. 2011 J. Anim. Sci. 2011. 89:2491–2501
Li et al. 2013 J. Anim. Sci. 2013.91:5399–5409
Linneen et al. 2015 J. Anim. Sci. 2015.93:3941–3949
Loor, J. J., Herbein, J. H. & Jenkins, T. C. Nutrient digestion, biohydrogenation, and fatty acid profiles in blood plasma and milk fat from lactating Holstein cows fed canola oil or canolamide. Animal Feed Science and Technology. 97 (1/2), 65-82, (2002).
Loor, J. J., Ueda, K., Ferlay, A., Chilliard, Y. & Doreau, M. Biohydrogenation, duodenal flow, and intestinal digestibility of trans fatty acids and conjugated linoleic acids in response to dietary forage:concentrate ratio and linseed oil in dairy cows. J Dairy Sci. 87 (8), 2472-2485, (2004).
Lu, Jorgensen, and Satter (1988) J Dairy Sci 71:697-704
Luebbe et al. 2012 J. Anim. Sci. 2012.90:1589–1602
Lykos et al., 1997. JDS 80: 3341-3355
Lynch et al., 1991. JDS 74: 3117-3127
M. Ciftci, O. Nihat Ertas, T. Guler. 2005. Revue. Med. Vet. 156:107-111
M. Kamiya, Y. Iwama, M. Tanaka, S. Shioya. 2005. Anim. Sci. J. 76:217-223
M. Sugahaea, D.H. Baker, B.G. Harmon, A.H. Jensen. 1970. JAS. 31:59-62
M.A. Cooper and K.W. Washburn. 1998. Poult. Sci. 77:237-242
M.A. Sutherland, S.R. Niekamp, S.L. Rodriguez-Zas and J.L. Salak-Johnson. 2006. JAS 84:588-596
M.E. Mohammed, H.D. Johnson. 1985. J. Dairy Sci. 68:1123-1133
M.F. Fuller. 1965. Br. J. Nutr. 19:531-546
M.L Rhoads, R.P. Rhoads, M.J. VanBalle, R.J. Collier, S.R. Sanders, W.J. Weber, B.A. Crooker, L.H. Baumgard. 2008. J. Dairy Sci. 92:1986-1997
M.M. Mashaly, G.L Hendricks, M.A. Kalama, A.E. Gehad, A.O. Abbas, P.H. Patterson. 2004. Poult. Sci. 83:889-894
M.S. Davis, T.L. Mader, S.M. Holt, A.M. Parkhurst. 2003. J. Anim. Sci. 81:649-661
M.S. honeyman, J.D. Harmon. 2003. JAS. 81:1663-1670
M.Y. Al-Saiady, M.A. Al-Shaikh, S.I. Al-Mufarrej, T.A. Al-Showeimi, H.H.Mogawer, A. Dirrar. 2004. Anim. Feed Sci. Tech. 117:223-233
Mabjeesh et al., 1996. JDS 79: 1792-1801
Mabjeesh et al., 1997. JDS 80: 2939-2949
Maddock et al., 2006. J. Anim. Sci. 84. 1544-1551
Madsen (1986) Acta Agric Scand 36: 275-285
Mandell et al. 1997. J. Anim. Sci. 75. 910-919
Mansfield, and Stern 1994 J Dairy Sci 77:1070-1083
Martinez-Perez et al. 2013. J. Anim. Sci. 91. 1350-1361
Matthews et al. 2005. J. Anim. Sci. 83. 1179-1185
May et al. 2009. Prof. Anim. Sci. 25. 599-568
Mc Geough et al. 2010. J. Anim. Sci. 88.8. 2703-2716
McCarthy et al., 1989. JDS 72: 2002-2016
McCartor et al. 1972. J. Anim. Sci. 34. 142-145
Merchen, and Satter (1983) J Dairy Sci. 66:789-801
Meyer et al. 2009 J. Anim. Sci. 2009. 87:2346–2354
Misciatteilli, L. et al. Milk production, nutrient utilization, and endocrine responses to increased postruminal lysine and methionine supply in dairy cows. J Dairy Sci. 86 (1), 275-286, (2003).
Moller (1985). Acta Agric Scand Supp, 25: 49-63
Montano et al. 1999. J. Anim. Sci. 780-784
Moore et al. 1986. J. Anim. Sci. 62. 235-243
Morris et al. 1990 J. Anim. Sci. 1990. 68:3069-3078
Mosoni et al., 2007. J Appl Microbiol. 103:2676-2685
Murphy et al. 1994. J. Anim. Sci. 72. 1608-1615
Murphy, Uden, Palmquist, and Wiktorsson (1987). Dairy Sci 70:1572-1582
N Sahin, M. Onderci, K. Sahin. 2002. Biol. Trace El. Res. 85:47-58
N. Quiniou, S. Dubois, J. Noblet. 2000. Livestock Prod. Sci. 63:245-253
N.M. Dale and H.L Fuller. 1980. Poult. Sci. 59:1434-1441
Narasimhalu, Teller, Vanbelle, Foulon, and Dasnoy (1989) J Dairy Sci 72:2055-2061
National Animal Nutrition Program (2014). Animal Performance Data, USDA Beltsville Agricultural Research Center. https://animalnutrition.org/. Accessed (Date)
National Animal Nutrition Program (2019). Broiler Chicken Growth Data. https://animalnutrition.org/.Accessed (Date).
Nelson et al. 2000. J. Anim. Sci. 78. 1829-1836
Nelson et al. 2004. 82. 3600-3610.
Noftsger, S., St-Pierre, N. R. & Sylvester, J. T. Determination of rumen degradability and ruminal effects of three sources of methionine in lactating cows. J Dairy Sci. 88 (1), 223-237, (2005).
Nuñez et al. 2014 J. Anim. Sci. 2014.92:3954–3965
O'Mara, F. P., Murphy, J. J. & Rath, M. Effect of amount of dietary supplement and source of protein on milk production, ruminal fermentation, and nutrient flows in dairy cows. J Dairy Sci.81 (9), 2430-2439, (1998).
Oba, M. & Allen, M. S. Effects of brown midrib 3 mutation in corn silage on productivity of dairy cows fed two concentrations of dietary neutral detergent fiber: 2. Chewing activities. J Dairy Sci.83 (6), 1342-1349, (2000).
Oba, M. & Allen, M. S. Effects of corn grain conservation method on ruminal digestion kinetics for lactating dairy cows at two dietary starch concentrations. J Dairy Sci.86 (1), 184-194, (2003).
Ohajuruka, Wu, and Palmquist (1991) J Dairy Sci 74:2601-2609
Oldham, Sutton, and Mcallan (1979). Ann Rech Vet 10:290-293
Oldick, B. S. & Firkins, J. L. Effects of degree of fat saturation on fiber digestion and microbial protein synthesis when diets are fed twelve times daily. J Anim Sci.78 (9), 2412-2420, (2000).
Oliveira et al., 1995. JDS 78: 1318-1327
Olmos Colmenero, J. J. & Broderick, G. A. Effect of dietary crude protein concentration on milk production and nitrogen utilization in lactating dairy cows. J Dairy Sci. 89 (5), 1704-1712, (2006).
Omara et al., 1997. JDS 80: 2466-2474
Opheim et al. 2016 J. Anim. Sci. 2016.94
Ordway, R. S., Boucher, S. E., Whitehouse, N. L., Schwab, C. G. & Sloan, B. K. Effects of providing two forms of supplemental methionine to periparturient Holstein dairy cows on feed intake and lactational performance. J Dairy Sci. 92 (10), 5154-5166, (2009).
Ouwenkerk et al., 2002. J Appl Microbiol. 92:753-758
Overton et al., 1995. JDS 78: 1981-1998
Overton, T. R., Emmert, L. S. & Clark, J. H. Effects of source of carbohydrate and protein and rumen-protected methionine on performance of cows. J Dairy Sci. 81 (1), 221-228, (1998).
Overton, T. R., LaCount, D. W., Cicela, T. M. & Clark, J. H. Evaluation of a ruminally protected methionine product for lactating dairy cows. J Dairy Sci. 79 (4), 631-638, (1996).
Ozutsumi et al. 2006. Curr Microbiol. 52:158-162
P. Tatli Seven, I. Seven, M. Yilmax, U.G. Simsek. 2008. Anim. Feed Sci. Tech. 146:137-148
P.A. Geraert, J.C.F. Padilha, S. Guillaumin. 1996. Brit. J. Nutr. 75:195-204
P.J. Colditz and R.C. Kellaway. 1972. Aust. J. Agric. Res. 23:717-725
Palmquist, D. L. Influence of source and amount of dietary fat on digestibility in lactating cows. J Dairy Sci. 74 (4), 1354-1360, (1991).
Palmquist, Weisbjerg, and Hvelplund (1993) J Dairy Sci 76: 1353-1364
Pantoja et al., 1995. JDS 78: 2247-2258
Pantoja, Firkins, Eastridge, and Hull 1994 J Dairy Sci 779341-2356
Pantoja, J., Firkins, J. L., Eastridge, M. L. & Hull, B. L. Fatty acid digestion in lactating dairy cows fed fats varying in degree of saturation and different fiber sources. J Dairy Sci. 79 (4), 575-584, (1996).
Papas, A. M., Sniffen, C. J. & Muscato, T. V. Effectiveness of rumen-protected methionine for delivering methionine postruminally in dairy cows. Journal of Dairy Science.67 (3), 545-552, (1984).
Papas, A. M., Vicini, J. L., Clark, J. H. & Peirce-Sandner, S. Effect of rumen-protected methionine on plasma free amino acids and production by dairy cows. J Nutr.114 (12), 2221-2227, (1984).
Pena,Tagari, and Satter (1986) JAS. 62:1423-1433
Peter et al. 2000. J. Anim. Sci. 78. 1-6
Peyraud, J. L., Astigarraga, L. & Faverdin, P. Digestion of fresh perennial ryegrass fertilized at two levels of nitrogen by lactating dairy cows. Animal Feed Science and Technology.64 (2), 155-171, (1997).
Piantoni, P., Lock, A. L. & Allen, M. S. Milk production responses to dietary stearic acid vary by production level in dairy cattle. J Dairy Sci. 98 (3), 1938-1949, (2015).
Piantoni, P., Lock, A. L. & Allen, M. S. Palmitic acid increased yields of milk and milk fat and nutrient digestibility across production level of lactating cows. J Dairy Sci. 96 (11), 7143-7154, (2013).
Pires et al., 1997. JDS 80: 1685-1694
Pires, A. V., Eastridge, M. L. & Firkins, J. L. Roasted soybeans, blood meal, and tallow as sources of fat and ruminally undegradable protein in the diets of lactating cows. J Dairy Sci. 79 (9), 1603-1610, (1996).
Pisulewski, P. M., Kowalski, Z. M. & G<f6>rg<fc>l<fc>, M. Lactational responses to ruminally-protected methionine in cows fed a low-protein grass silage-based diet. Journal of Animal and Feed Sciences. 11 (2), 189-203, (2002).
Pisulewski, P. M., Rulquin, H., Peyraud, J. L. & Verite, R. Lactational and systemic responses of dairy cows to postruminal infusions of increasing amounts of methionine. J Dairy Sci. 79 (10), 1781-1791, (1996).
Plascencia, A. & Zinn, R. A. Influence of flake density on the feeding value of steam-processed corn in diets for lactating cows. J Anim Sci.74 (2), 310-316, (1996).
Polan, C. E. et al. Responses of dairy cows to supplemental rumen-protected forms of methionine and lysine. J Dairy Sci. 74 (9), 2997-3013, (1991).
Ponce et al. 2013 J. Anim. Sci. 2013.91:3400–3407
Poore, Moore, Eck, Swingle, and Theurer (1993) J Dairy Sci 76: 2244-2253
Prange, Stern, Jorgensen, and Satter (1984) J Dairy Sci 67:2308-2314
Price et al. 2011. J. Anim. Sci. 89. 809-814
Price et al., (1988). J Dairy Sci 71:727-736
Pruekvimolphan, S. & Grummer, R. R. Lactation responses to sulfur-containing amino acids from feather meal or rumen-protected methionine. J Dairy Sci. 84 (11), 2515-2522, (2001).
Putnam et al., 1997. JDS 80: 374-384
Q. Lu, J. Wen, H. Zhang. 2007. Poult. Sci. 86:1059-1064
Qiu, X., Eastridge, M. L. & Firkins, J. L. Effects of dry matter intake, addition of buffer, and source of fat on duodenal flow and concentration of conjugated linoleic acid and trans-11 C18:1 in milk. J Dairy Sci.87 (12), 4278-4286, (2004).
Quinn et al. 2011. J. Anim. Sci. 89. 2631-2642
R. Bouraoui, M. Lahmar, A Majdoub, M. Djemali, R. Belyea. 2002. Anim. Res. 51:479-491
R. Christon. 1988. JAS. 66:3112-3123
R.G. Lundgren, H.D. Johnson. 1964. J. Anim. Sci. 23:28-31
R.S. Settivari, J.N. Spain, M.R. Ellersieck, J.C. Byatt, R.J. Collier, D.E. Spiers. 2007. J. Dairy Sci. 90:1265-1280
Radunz et al. 2003. J. Anim. Sci. 81. 2675-2685
Remond, D. et al. Effect of corn particle size on site and extent of starch digestion in lactating dairy cows. J Dairy Sci. 87 (5), 1389-1399, (2004).
Reveneau, C., Karnati, S. K., Oelker, E. R. & Firkins, J. L. Interaction of unsaturated fat or coconut oil with monensin in lactating dairy cows fed 12 times daily. I. Protozoal abundance, nutrient digestibility, and microbial protein flow to the omasum. J Dairy Sci. 95 (4), 2046-2060, (2012).
Reynal, S. M. et al. Omasal flow of soluble proteins, peptides, and free amino acids in dairy cows fed diets supplemented with proteins of varying ruminal degradabilities. J Dairy Sci.90 (4), 1887-1903, (2007).
Rico, D. E., Ying, Y. & Harvatine, K. J. Effect of a high-palmitic acid fat supplement on milk production and apparent total-tract digestibility in high- and low-milk yield dairy cows. J Dairy Sci. 97 (6), 3739-3751, (2014).
Rius, A. G., McGilliard, M. L., Umberger, C. A. & Hanigan, M. D. Interactions of energy and predicted metabolizable protein in determining nitrogen efficiency in the lactating dairy cow. J Dairy Sci. 93 (5), 2034-2043, (2010).
Robinson, DeBoer, and Kennelly (1991) J Dairy Sci 74:350S3517
Robinson, Gill, and Kennelly 1997 J Dairy Sci 80:1366–1373
Robinson, Kennelly (1990) JDS 73:3147
Robinson, Khorasani, and Kennelly (1994) J Dairy Sci 77:552-559
Robinson, P. H. Modifying duodenal flow of amino acids by manipulation of dietary protein sources. Canadian Journal of Animal Science.77 (2), 241-251, (1997).
Robinson, P. H. et al. Influence of abomasal infusion of high levels of lysine or methionine, or both, on ruminal fermentation, eating behavior, and performance of lactating dairy cows. J Anim Sci. 78 (4), 1067-1077, (2000).
Robinson, Sniffen, and Van Soest (1985). Can. J. Anim. Sci. 65:437- 444
Robinson, and Sniffen (1985) J Dairy Sci 68:857-867
Rode, Weakley, and Satter (1985). Can. J. Anim. Sci. 65: 101-111
Rode, and Satter (1988). Can. J. Anim. Sci. 68:. 45-454
Rogers, J. A., Krishnamoorthy, U. & Sniffen, C. J. Plasma amino acids and milk protein production by cows fed rumen-protected methionine and lysine. J Dairy Sci. 70 (4), 789-798, (1987).
Rotget et al. 2006. J. Anim. Sci. 84. 1188-1196
Rulquin, H. & Delaby, L. Effects of the energy balance of dairy cows on lactational responses to rumen-protected methionine. J Dairy Sci. 80 (10), 2513-2522, (1997).
Rulquin, H., Graulet, B., Delaby, L. & Robert, J. C. Effect of different forms of methionine on lactational performance of dairy cows. J Dairy Sci.89 (11), 4387-4394, (2006).
S. Bollengier-Lee, P.E.V. Williams, C.C. Whitehead. 2010. B. Poult. Sci.
S. Bonnet, P.A. Geraert, M. Lessire, B. Carre, S. Guillaumin. 1997. Poult. Sci 76:857-863
S. L. Archibeque, J. C. Burns and G. B. Huntington,J Anim Sci 2001. 79:1937-1943.
S. L. Archibeque, J. C. Burns and G. B. Huntington. J ANIM SCI 2002, 80:1344-1351
S. Temim, A.M. Chagneau, S. Guillaumin, J. Michel, R. Peereson, S. Tesseraud. 2000. Poult. Sci 79:312-317
S. Yahav, S. Hurwitz. 1996. Poult. Sci. 75(402-406)
S.A. Borges, A.V. Fischer da Silva, J. Ariki, D.M. Hooge, K.R. Cummings. 2003. Poult. Sci. 82:428-435
S.R. Morrison, J. Jeitman, R.L Givens. 1975. Anim. Prod. 20:287-291
S.R. Morrison, L.E. Mount. 1971. Anim. Prod. 13:51-57
Sairanen, A., Khalili, H., Nousiainen, J. I., Ahvenjarvi, S. & Huhtanen, P. The effect of concentrate supplementation on nutrient flow to the omasum in dairy cows receiving freshly cut grass. J Dairy Sci.88 (4), 1443-1453, (2005).
Samuelson, D. J. et al. Response of Holstein and Brown Swiss cows fed alfalfa hay-based diets to supplemental methionine at two stages of lactation. J Dairy Sci. 84 (4), 917-928, (2001).
Santos, Stern, and Satter (1984). JAS, 58: 244-255
Sarwar, Firkins, and Eastridge (1991) J Dairy Sci 741006-1017
Scholljegerdes et al. 2008 J. Anim. Sci. 2008. 86:2310–2320
Schwab, Bozak, Whitehouse, and Mesbah (1992) J Dairy Sci 75:3486-3502
Schwab, Bozak, Whitehouse, and Olson 1992 J Dairy Sci 75:3503-3518
Seymour, Polan, and Herbein (1992) J Dairy Sci 75:2447-2453
Simas, J. M. et al. Influence of fat source and sorghum grain treatment on performance and digestibilities of high yielding dairy cows. J Dairy Sci. 80 (11), 2907-2912, (1997).
Simas, J. M. et al. Influence of sorghum grain processing on performance and nutrient digestibilities in dairy cows fed varying concentrations of fat. J Dairy Sci. 81 (7), 1966-1971, (1998).
Siverson et al. 2014 J. Anim. Sci. 2014.92:1604–1612
Socha, M. T. et al. Improving intestinal amino acid supply of pre- and postpartum dairy cows with rumen-protected methionine and lysine. J Dairy Sci. 88 (3), 1113-1126, (2005).
Soder, K. J. & Holden, L. A. Lymphocyte proliferation response of lactating dairy cows fed varying concentrations of rumen-protected methionine. J Dairy Sci. 82 (9), 1935-1942, (1999).
Song, and Kennelly (1989) J Dairy Sci 72:2981-2990
Soto-Navarro et al. 2004 J. Anim. Sci. 2004. 82:1855–1862
Steen and Kilpatrick. 2000. Livestock Prod. Sci. 62. 181-192
Stensig and Robinson, 1997. JDS 80: 1339-1352
Stensig, T., Weisbjerg, M. R. & Hvelplund, T. Digestion and passage kinetics of fibre in dairy cows as affected by the proportion of wheat starch or sucrose in the diet. Acta Agricultur<e6> Scandinavica. Section A, Animal Science. 48 (3), 129-140, (1998).
Stern, Rode, Prange, Stauffacher, and Satter (1983). JAS, 56, 194-205
Stern, Santos, and Satter (1985) J Dairy Sci 68:45--56
Stevenson and Weimer, 2007. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 75:165-174
Stiverson et al., 2011. Int J Microbiol. 2011:750613
Stokes, Hoover, Miller, and Blauweikel 1991 J Dairy Sci 74:871-881
Sylvester et al., 2005. J Dairy Sci. 88:2083-2095
T.A. Hicks, J.J. McGlone, C.S. Whisnant, H.G. Kattesh, R.L. Norman. 1998. JAS. 76:474-483
T.E. Bond, C.F. Kelly, H. Heitman. 1963. Trans ASABE. 6(3):132-135
T.F. Shiao, J.C. Chen, D.W. Yang, S.N. Lee, C.F. Lee, W.T.K. Chang. 2011. J. Dairy Sci. 94:53393-5404
T.L. Mader and M.S. Davis. 2004. J. Anim. Sci. 82:3077-3087
T.L. Mader, J.M. Dahlquist, G.L. Hahn, J.B. Gaughan. 1999. J. Anim. Sci. 77:2065-2072
T.M. Brown-Brandl, J.A. Nienaber, L.W. Turner. 1998. Trans ASABE. 41(2):789-793
T.M. Brown-Brandl, R.A. Eigenberg, J.A. Nienaber, G.L. Hahn. 2005. Biosyst. Eng. 90:461-462
T.R. Smith, A. Chapa, S. Willard, C. Herndon, R.J. Williams, J. Crouch, T. Riley, D. Pogue. 2006. J. Dairy Sci.
T.S. Stahly, G.L. Cromwell. 1979. JAS. 49:1478-1488
T.S. Whiting, L.D. Andrews, L. Stamps. 1991. Poult. Sci. 70:53-59
T.T.T. Huynh, A.J.A. Aarnink, C.T. Truong, B. Kempt, M.W.A. Verstegen. 2005. Livestock Sci. 104:278-291
Tajima et al., 2001. Appl Environ Microbiol. 67:2766-2774
Tamminga, 1981 Neth J Agric Sci. 29:273-283
Tamminga, Van Der Koelen, and Van Vuuren (1979) Livestock Production Science, 6: 255-262
Taylor, C. C. & Allen, M. S. Corn grain endosperm type and brown midrib 3 corn silage: site of digestion and ruminal digestion kinetics in lactating cows. J Dairy Sci.88 (4), 1413-1424, (2005).
Teller, VanBelle, Foulon, Collignon, and Matau(1992) J Dairy Sci 75:12961304
Tice, Eastridge, and Firkins (1993) J Dairy Sci 76:224-235
Titgemeyer, E. C., et al. Journal of animal science 90.10 (2012): 3515-3526.
U. Puthpongsiriporn, S.E. Scheideler, J.L Sell, M.M. Beck. 2001. Poult. Sci.
Ueda, K. et al. Effect of linseed oil supplementation on ruminal digestion in dairy cows fed diets with different forage:concentrate ratios. J Dairy Sci.86 (12), 3999-4007, (2003).
Van Vuuren, A. M., Hindle, V. A., Klop, A. & Cone, J. W. Effect of maize starch concentration in the diet on starch and cell wall digestion in the dairy cow. J Anim Physiol Anim Nutr (Berl). 94 (3), 319-329, (2010).
Van Vuuren, A. M., Klop, A., Van der Koelen, C. J. & de Visser, H. Starch and stage of maturity of grass silage: site of digestion and intestinal nutrient supply in dairy cows. J Dairy Sci.82 (1), 143-152, (1999).
Van Vuuren, Krol-Kramer, Van Der Lee, and Corbijn (1992) J Dairy Sci 75:2215-2225
Vanhatalo, A., G<e4>ddn<e4>s, T. & Heikkil<e4>, T. Microbial protein synthesis, digestion and lactation responses of cows to grass or grass-red clover silage diet supplemented with barley or oats. Agricultural and Food Science. 15 (3), 252-267, (2006).
Vanhatalo, A., Huhtanen, P., Toivonen, V. & Varvikko, T. Response of dairy cows fed grass silage diets to abomasal infusions of histidine alone or in combinations with methionine and lysine. J Dairy Sci. 82 (12), 2674-2685, (1999).
Varvikko, T., Vanhatalo, A., Jalava, T. & Huhtanen, P. Lactation and metabolic responses to graded abomasal doses of methionine and lysine in cows fed grass silage diets. J Dairy Sci. 82 (12), 2659-2673, (1999).
Voelker Linton, J. A., & Allen, M. S., 2008. J Dairy Sci, 91(7):2694-2701.
Voelker, J. A. & Allen, M. S. Pelleted beet pulp substituted for high-moisture corn: 2. Effects on digestion and ruminal digestion kinetics in lactating dairy cows. J Dairy Sci.86 (11), 3553-3561, (2003).
Volden, H. Effects of level of feeding and ruminally undegraded protein on ruminal bacterial protein synthesis, escape of dietary protein, intestinal amino acid profile, and performance of dairy cows. J Anim Sci.77 (7), 1905-1918, (1999).
Vyas et al. 2014 J. Anim. Sci. 2014.92:2192–2201
Vyas et al. 2014 J. Anim. Sci. 2014.92:724–732
W.G. Bottje and P.C. Harrison. 1985. Poult. Sci.
W.H. Close, L.E. Mount. 1978. B. J. Nut. 40:413-421
Walter et al. 2012 J. Anim. Sci. 2012. 90:1291–1300
Waltz, Stern, and Illg (1989) J Dairy Sci 72:1509--1518
Weekes, T. L., Luimes, P. H. & Cant, J. P. Responses to amino acid imbalances and deficiencies in lactating dairy cows. J Dairy Sci. 89 (6), 2177-2187, (2006).
Weimer et al., 2008. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 80:135-145
Weisbjerg, Borsting, and Hvelplund (1991). Acta Agriculturae Scandinavica A - Animal Sciences, 42:2, 106-114
Weisbjerg, M. R., B<f8>rsting, C. F. & Hvelplund, T. Fatty acid metabolism in the digestive tract of lactating cows fed tallow in increasing amounts at two feed levels. Acta Agriculturae Scandinavica. Section A, Animal Science. 42 (2), 106-114, (1992).
Weiss, W. P. & Wyatt, D. J. Digestible energy values of diets with different fat supplements when fed to lactating dairy cows. J Dairy Sci. 87 (5), 1446-1454, (2004).
Wickersham, T. A., E. C. Titgemeyer, and R. C. Cochran. animal 3.03 (2009): 372-379.
Wickersham, T. A., et al. Journal of animal science 86.11 (2008): 3079-3088.
Wickersham, Tryon A., et al. British Journal of Nutrition 101.2 (2008): 225-232.
Windschitl, and Stern (1988) J Dairy Sci 71:3310-3322
Wonsil, B. J., Herbein, J. H. & Watkins, B. A. Dietary and ruminally derived trans-18:1 fatty acids alter bovine milk lipids. J Nutr. 124 (4), 556-565, (1994).
Y. Han and D. Baker. 1993. Poult Sci. 72:701-708
Y. Hyun, M. Ellis, G. Riskowski, R.W. Johnson. 1998. JAS. 76:721-727
Yang et al. 2012. J. Anim. Sci. 90. 1301-1310
Yang et al. 2014 J. Anim. Sci. 2014.92:5088–5098
Yang et al., 1997. JDS 80: 2475-2486
Yang, W. Z. & Beauchemin, K. A. Effects of physically effective fiber on digestion and milk production by dairy cows fed diets based on corn silage. J Dairy Sci.88 (3), 1090-1098, (2005).
Yang, W. Z. & Beauchemin, K. A. Grain Processing, Forage-to-Concentrate Ratio, and Forage Length Effects on Ruminal Nitrogen Degradation and Flows of Amino Acids to the Duodenum. Journal of Dairy Science. 87 (8), 2578-2590, (2004).
Yang, W. Z., Beauchemin, K. A. & Rode, L. M. Effects of an Enzyme Feed Additive on Extent of Digestion and Milk Production of Lactating Dairy Cows1. Journal of Dairy Science.82 (2), 391-403, (1999).
Yang, W. Z., Beauchemin, K. A. & Rode, L. M. Effects of barley grain processing on extent of digestion and milk production of lactating cows. J Dairy Sci.83 (3), 554-568, (2000).
Yang, W. Z., Beauchemin, K. A. & Rode, L. M. Effects of particle size of alfalfa-based dairy cow diets on site and extent of digestion. J Dairy Sci. 85 (8), 1958-1968, (2002).
Yoon and Stern, 1996. JDS 79: 411-417
Younker, R. S., Winland, S. D., Firkins, J. L. & Hull, B. L. Effects of replacing forage fiber or nonfiber carbohydrates with dried brewers grains. J Dairy Sci.81 (10), 2645-2656, (1998).
Z.H.M. Abu-Dieyeh. 2006. Int. J. Poult. Sci. 21(185-190)
Z.Y. Niu, F.Z. Liu, Q.L. Yan, W.C. Li. 2009. Poult. Sci.
Zerbini, Polan, and Herbein (1988) J Dairy Sci 71:1248-1258
Zhu et al., 1997. JDS 80: 2901-2906
Zinn and Borques. 1993. J. Anim. Sci. 71. 18-25
Zinn. 1991. J. Anim. Sci. 69. 905-916
de Oliveira et al. 2007. Animal feed Science and technology. 135.3: 236-248.
de Souza, J., Garver, J. L., Preseault, C. L. & Lock, A. L. Short communication: Effects of prill size of a palmitic acid-enriched fat supplement on the yield of milk and milk components, and nutrient digestibility of dairy cows. J Dairy Sci. 100 (1), 379-384, (2017).
No Filter
Select Variable
Operation
No Filter
No Filter
<
>
=
>=
<=
Value
No Filter
No Filter
<
>
=
>=
<=
No Filter
No Filter
<
>
=
>=
<=
Filter
Clear All Filters
Export Database
Export All Database Tables as SQL file
Export All CSV's as ZIP file
Abbreviations List
Total Terms :
Abbreviation
Name
Table
Study Descriptors Table
DataSet
PubID
TrialID
VarName
VarValue
VarUnits
USDA Beltsville
1
1
Reference
National Animal Nutrition Program (2014). Animal Performance Data, USDA Beltsville Agricultural Research Center. https://animalnutrition.org/. Accessed (Date)
-
USDA Beltsville
1
2
Reference
National Animal Nutrition Program (2014). Animal Performance Data, USDA Beltsville Agricultural Research Center. https://animalnutrition.org/. Accessed (Date)
-
USDA Beltsville
1
3
Reference
National Animal Nutrition Program (2014). Animal Performance Data, USDA Beltsville Agricultural Research Center. https://animalnutrition.org/. Accessed (Date)
-
USDA Beltsville
1
4
Reference
National Animal Nutrition Program (2014). Animal Performance Data, USDA Beltsville Agricultural Research Center. https://animalnutrition.org/. Accessed (Date)
-
USDA Beltsville
1
5
Reference
National Animal Nutrition Program (2014). Animal Performance Data, USDA Beltsville Agricultural Research Center. https://animalnutrition.org/. Accessed (Date)
-
USDA Beltsville
1
6
Reference
National Animal Nutrition Program (2014). Animal Performance Data, USDA Beltsville Agricultural Research Center. https://animalnutrition.org/. Accessed (Date)
-
USDA Beltsville
1
7
Reference
National Animal Nutrition Program (2014). Animal Performance Data, USDA Beltsville Agricultural Research Center. https://animalnutrition.org/. Accessed (Date)
-
USDA Beltsville
1
8
Reference
National Animal Nutrition Program (2014). Animal Performance Data, USDA Beltsville Agricultural Research Center. https://animalnutrition.org/. Accessed (Date)
-
USDA Beltsville
1
9
Reference
National Animal Nutrition Program (2014). Animal Performance Data, USDA Beltsville Agricultural Research Center. https://animalnutrition.org/. Accessed (Date)
-
USDA Beltsville
1
10
Reference
National Animal Nutrition Program (2014). Animal Performance Data, USDA Beltsville Agricultural Research Center. https://animalnutrition.org/. Accessed (Date)
-
USDA Beltsville
1
11
Reference
National Animal Nutrition Program (2014). Animal Performance Data, USDA Beltsville Agricultural Research Center. https://animalnutrition.org/. Accessed (Date)
-
USDA Beltsville
1
12
Reference
National Animal Nutrition Program (2014). Animal Performance Data, USDA Beltsville Agricultural Research Center. https://animalnutrition.org/. Accessed (Date)
-
USDA Beltsville
1
13
Reference
National Animal Nutrition Program (2014). Animal Performance Data, USDA Beltsville Agricultural Research Center. https://animalnutrition.org/. Accessed (Date)
-
USDA Beltsville
1
14
Reference
National Animal Nutrition Program (2014). Animal Performance Data, USDA Beltsville Agricultural Research Center. https://animalnutrition.org/. Accessed (Date)
-
USDA Beltsville
1
15
Reference
National Animal Nutrition Program (2014). Animal Performance Data, USDA Beltsville Agricultural Research Center. https://animalnutrition.org/. Accessed (Date)
-
USDA Beltsville
1
16
Reference
National Animal Nutrition Program (2014). Animal Performance Data, USDA Beltsville Agricultural Research Center. https://animalnutrition.org/. Accessed (Date)
-
USDA Beltsville
1
17
Reference
National Animal Nutrition Program (2014). Animal Performance Data, USDA Beltsville Agricultural Research Center. https://animalnutrition.org/. Accessed (Date)
-
USDA Beltsville
1
23
Reference
National Animal Nutrition Program (2014). Animal Performance Data, USDA Beltsville Agricultural Research Center. https://animalnutrition.org/. Accessed (Date)
-
USDA Beltsville
1
24
Reference
National Animal Nutrition Program (2014). Animal Performance Data, USDA Beltsville Agricultural Research Center. https://animalnutrition.org/. Accessed (Date)
-
USDA Beltsville
1
25
Reference
National Animal Nutrition Program (2014). Animal Performance Data, USDA Beltsville Agricultural Research Center. https://animalnutrition.org/. Accessed (Date)
-
USDA Beltsville
1
27
Reference
National Animal Nutrition Program (2014). Animal Performance Data, USDA Beltsville Agricultural Research Center. https://animalnutrition.org/. Accessed (Date)
-
USDA Beltsville
1
29
Reference
National Animal Nutrition Program (2014). Animal Performance Data, USDA Beltsville Agricultural Research Center. https://animalnutrition.org/. Accessed (Date)
-
USDA Beltsville
1
31
Reference
National Animal Nutrition Program (2014). Animal Performance Data, USDA Beltsville Agricultural Research Center. https://animalnutrition.org/. Accessed (Date)
-
USDA Beltsville
1
33
Reference
National Animal Nutrition Program (2014). Animal Performance Data, USDA Beltsville Agricultural Research Center. https://animalnutrition.org/. Accessed (Date)
-
USDA Beltsville
1
35
Reference
National Animal Nutrition Program (2014). Animal Performance Data, USDA Beltsville Agricultural Research Center. https://animalnutrition.org/. Accessed (Date)
-
USDA Beltsville
4
2
Reference
National Animal Nutrition Program (2014). Animal Performance Data, USDA Beltsville Agricultural Research Center. https://animalnutrition.org/. Accessed (Date)
-
USDA Beltsville
4
3
Reference
National Animal Nutrition Program (2014). Animal Performance Data, USDA Beltsville Agricultural Research Center. https://animalnutrition.org/. Accessed (Date)
-
USDA Beltsville
2
0
Reference
National Animal Nutrition Program (2014). Animal Performance Data, USDA Beltsville Agricultural Research Center. https://animalnutrition.org/. Accessed (Date)
-
USDA Beltsville
3
0
Reference
National Animal Nutrition Program (2014). Animal Performance Data, USDA Beltsville Agricultural Research Center. https://animalnutrition.org/. Accessed (Date)
-
USDA Beltsville
3
1
Reference
National Animal Nutrition Program (2014). Animal Performance Data, USDA Beltsville Agricultural Research Center. https://animalnutrition.org/. Accessed (Date)
-
USDA Beltsville
3
2
Reference
National Animal Nutrition Program (2014). Animal Performance Data, USDA Beltsville Agricultural Research Center. https://animalnutrition.org/. Accessed (Date)
-
USDA Beltsville
3
3
Reference
National Animal Nutrition Program (2014). Animal Performance Data, USDA Beltsville Agricultural Research Center. https://animalnutrition.org/. Accessed (Date)
-
USDA Beltsville
2
4
Reference
National Animal Nutrition Program (2014). Animal Performance Data, USDA Beltsville Agricultural Research Center. https://animalnutrition.org/. Accessed (Date)
-
USDA Beltsville
3
4
Reference
National Animal Nutrition Program (2014). Animal Performance Data, USDA Beltsville Agricultural Research Center. https://animalnutrition.org/. Accessed (Date)
-
USDA Beltsville
2
5
Reference
National Animal Nutrition Program (2014). Animal Performance Data, USDA Beltsville Agricultural Research Center. https://animalnutrition.org/. Accessed (Date)
-
USDA Beltsville
3
5
Reference
National Animal Nutrition Program (2014). Animal Performance Data, USDA Beltsville Agricultural Research Center. https://animalnutrition.org/. Accessed (Date)
-
USDA Beltsville
3
6
Reference
National Animal Nutrition Program (2014). Animal Performance Data, USDA Beltsville Agricultural Research Center. https://animalnutrition.org/. Accessed (Date)
-
USDA Beltsville
3
7
Reference
National Animal Nutrition Program (2014). Animal Performance Data, USDA Beltsville Agricultural Research Center. https://animalnutrition.org/. Accessed (Date)
-
USDA Beltsville
3
8
Reference
National Animal Nutrition Program (2014). Animal Performance Data, USDA Beltsville Agricultural Research Center. https://animalnutrition.org/. Accessed (Date)
-
USDA Beltsville
3
9
Reference
National Animal Nutrition Program (2014). Animal Performance Data, USDA Beltsville Agricultural Research Center. https://animalnutrition.org/. Accessed (Date)
-
USDA Beltsville
2
10
Reference
National Animal Nutrition Program (2014). Animal Performance Data, USDA Beltsville Agricultural Research Center. https://animalnutrition.org/. Accessed (Date)
-
USDA Beltsville
3
10
Reference
National Animal Nutrition Program (2014). Animal Performance Data, USDA Beltsville Agricultural Research Center. https://animalnutrition.org/. Accessed (Date)
-
USDA Beltsville
3
11
Reference
National Animal Nutrition Program (2014). Animal Performance Data, USDA Beltsville Agricultural Research Center. https://animalnutrition.org/. Accessed (Date)
-
USDA Beltsville
3
12
Reference
National Animal Nutrition Program (2014). Animal Performance Data, USDA Beltsville Agricultural Research Center. https://animalnutrition.org/. Accessed (Date)
-
USDA Beltsville
2
1
Reference
National Animal Nutrition Program (2014). Animal Performance Data, USDA Beltsville Agricultural Research Center. https://animalnutrition.org/. Accessed (Date)
-
USDA Beltsville
2
6
Reference
National Animal Nutrition Program (2014). Animal Performance Data, USDA Beltsville Agricultural Research Center. https://animalnutrition.org/. Accessed (Date)
-
USDA Beltsville
2
7
Reference
National Animal Nutrition Program (2014). Animal Performance Data, USDA Beltsville Agricultural Research Center. https://animalnutrition.org/. Accessed (Date)
-
USDA Beltsville
5
1
Reference
National Animal Nutrition Program (2014). Animal Performance Data, USDA Beltsville Agricultural Research Center. https://animalnutrition.org/. Accessed (Date)
-
USDA Beltsville
5
2
Reference
National Animal Nutrition Program (2014). Animal Performance Data, USDA Beltsville Agricultural Research Center. https://animalnutrition.org/. Accessed (Date)
-
USDA Beltsville
5
3
Reference
National Animal Nutrition Program (2014). Animal Performance Data, USDA Beltsville Agricultural Research Center. https://animalnutrition.org/. Accessed (Date)
-
Dietary Ingredients Table
DataSet
PubID
TrialID
TrtID
UID
RepUID
VarName
Varvalue
VarUnits
N
SE
SD
USDA Beltsville
1
0
23
-
1
Fd_DietInc
100
%
-
-
-
USDA Beltsville
1
0
42
-
1
Fd_DietInc
100
%
-
-
-
USDA Beltsville
1
1
42
-
1
Fd_DietInc
100
%
-
-
-
USDA Beltsville
1
1
43
-
1
Fd_DietInc
100
%
-
-
-
USDA Beltsville
1
1
44
-
1
Fd_DietInc
100
%
-
-
-
USDA Beltsville
1
1
12
-
1
Fd_DietInc
100
%
-
-
-
USDA Beltsville
1
1
23
-
1
Fd_DietInc
100
%
-
-
-
USDA Beltsville
1
1
24
-
1
Fd_DietInc
100
%
-
-
-
USDA Beltsville
1
2
22
-
1
Fd_DietInc
100
%
-
-
-
USDA Beltsville
1
2
14
-
1
Fd_DietInc
100
%
-
-
-
USDA Beltsville
1
2
42
-
1
Fd_DietInc
100
%
-
-
-
USDA Beltsville
1
3
42
-
1
Fd_DietInc
100
%
-
-
-
USDA Beltsville
1
3
43
-
1
Fd_DietInc
100
%
-
-
-
USDA Beltsville
1
3
44
-
1
Fd_DietInc
100
%
-
-
-
USDA Beltsville
1
3
13
-
1
Fd_DietInc
100
%
-
-
-
USDA Beltsville
1
3
23
-
1
Fd_DietInc
100
%
-
-
-
USDA Beltsville
1
4
12
-
1
Fd_DietInc
100
%
-
-
-
USDA Beltsville
1
4
14
-
1
Fd_DietInc
100
%
-
-
-
USDA Beltsville
1
4
23
-
1
Fd_DietInc
100
%
-
-
-
USDA Beltsville
1
4
22
-
1
Fd_DietInc
100
%
-
-
-
USDA Beltsville
1
4
42
-
1
Fd_DietInc
100
%
-
-
-
USDA Beltsville
1
5
42
-
1
Fd_DietInc
100
%
-
-
-
USDA Beltsville
1
5
43
-
1
Fd_DietInc
100
%
-
-
-
USDA Beltsville
1
5
44
-
1
Fd_DietInc
100
%
-
-
-
USDA Beltsville
1
5
13
-
1
Fd_DietInc
100
%
-
-
-
Dietary Nutrients Table
DataSet
PubID
TrialID
TrtID
SubjectID
VarName
Varvalue
VarUnits
N
SE
SD
USDA Beltsville
1
1
43
191
Dt_ADF
39.5
% DM
-
-
-
USDA Beltsville
1
2
43
191
Dt_ADF
39.5
% DM
-
-
-
USDA Beltsville
1
4
44
191
Dt_ADF
39.5
% DM
-
-
-
USDA Beltsville
1
5
42
191
Dt_ADF
39.5
% DM
-
-
-
USDA Beltsville
1
6
24
191
Dt_ADF
39.48
% DM
-
-
-
USDA Beltsville
1
8
23
191
Dt_ADF
39.48
% DM
-
-
-
USDA Beltsville
1
10
22
191
Dt_ADF
39.48
% DM
-
-
-
USDA Beltsville
1
12
13
191
Dt_ADF
27.85
% DM
-
-
-
USDA Beltsville
1
14
12
191
Dt_ADF
27.85
% DM
-
-
-
USDA Beltsville
1
16
14
191
Dt_ADF
27.85
% DM
-
-
-
USDA Beltsville
1
23
44
191
Dt_ADF
39.5
% DM
-
-
-
USDA Beltsville
1
24
42
191
Dt_ADF
39.5
% DM
-
-
-
USDA Beltsville
1
25
24
191
Dt_ADF
39.48
% DM
-
-
-
USDA Beltsville
1
27
23
191
Dt_ADF
39.48
% DM
-
-
-
USDA Beltsville
1
29
22
191
Dt_ADF
39.48
% DM
-
-
-
USDA Beltsville
1
31
13
191
Dt_ADF
27.85
% DM
-
-
-
USDA Beltsville
1
33
12
191
Dt_ADF
27.85
% DM
-
-
-
USDA Beltsville
1
35
14
191
Dt_ADF
27.85
% DM
-
-
-
USDA Beltsville
1
1
13
192
Dt_ADF
29.39
% DM
-
-
-
USDA Beltsville
1
2
13
192
Dt_ADF
29.39
% DM
-
-
-
USDA Beltsville
1
4
14
192
Dt_ADF
29.39
% DM
-
-
-
USDA Beltsville
1
5
12
192
Dt_ADF
29.39
% DM
-
-
-
USDA Beltsville
1
6
44
192
Dt_ADF
38.66
% DM
-
-
-
USDA Beltsville
1
8
43
192
Dt_ADF
38.66
% DM
-
-
-
USDA Beltsville
1
10
42
192
Dt_ADF
38.66
% DM
-
-
-
Subjects Table
DataSet
PubID
TrialID
TrtID
SubjectID
VarName
Varvalue
VarUnits
N
SE
SD
USDA Beltsville
75
2
11
9215
Subj_Breed
Holstein
-
-
-
-
USDA Beltsville
75
4
13
8866
Subj_Breed
Holstein
-
-
-
-
USDA Beltsville
75
2
13
9085
Subj_Breed
Holstein
-
-
-
-
USDA Beltsville
75
1
13
9098
Subj_Breed
Holstein
-
-
-
-
USDA Beltsville
75
1
21
8462
Subj_Breed
Holstein
-
-
-
-
USDA Beltsville
75
3
23
8866
Subj_Breed
Holstein
-
-
-
-
USDA Beltsville
75
4
23
9085
Subj_Breed
Holstein
-
-
-
-
USDA Beltsville
75
2
23
9098
Subj_Breed
Holstein
-
-
-
-
USDA Beltsville
75
4
23
9215
Subj_Breed
Holstein
-
-
-
-
USDA Beltsville
75
1
31
9085
Subj_Breed
Holstein
-
-
-
-
USDA Beltsville
75
1
33
8866
Subj_Breed
Holstein
-
-
-
-
USDA Beltsville
75
4
33
9098
Subj_Breed
Holstein
-
-
-
-
USDA Beltsville
75
3
33
9215
Subj_Breed
Holstein
-
-
-
-
USDA Beltsville
75
1
41
9215
Subj_Breed
Holstein
-
-
-
-
USDA Beltsville
75
2
43
8866
Subj_Breed
Holstein
-
-
-
-
USDA Beltsville
75
3
43
9085
Subj_Breed
Holstein
-
-
-
-
USDA Beltsville
75
3
43
9098
Subj_Breed
Holstein
-
-
-
-
USDA Beltsville
76
1
11
682
Subj_Breed
Holstein
-
-
-
-
USDA Beltsville
76
2
11
9035
Subj_Breed
Holstein
-
-
-
-
USDA Beltsville
76
3
11
9274
Subj_Breed
Holstein
-
-
-
-
USDA Beltsville
76
3
11
9295
Subj_Breed
Holstein
-
-
-
-
USDA Beltsville
76
3
11
9421
Subj_Breed
Holstein
-
-
-
-
USDA Beltsville
76
4
11
9472
Subj_Breed
Holstein
-
-
-
-
USDA Beltsville
76
1
11
9484
Subj_Breed
Holstein
-
-
-
-
USDA Beltsville
76
2
11
9494
Subj_Breed
Holstein
-
-
-
-
Performance Data Table
DataSet
PubID
TrialID
TrtID
SubjectID
Site_Sample
Day_Sample
Time_Sample
VarName
VarValue
VarUnits
N
SE
SD
VarType
USDA Beltsville
75
2
11
9215
Animal
-
-
Abs_CP
2432.8
g/d
-
Nitrogen balance
USDA Beltsville
75
4
13
8866
Animal
-
-
Abs_CP
3227.162
g/d
-
Nitrogen balance
USDA Beltsville
75
2
13
9085
Animal
-
-
Abs_CP
2517.106
g/d
-
Nitrogen balance
USDA Beltsville
75
1
13
9098
Animal
-
-
Abs_CP
2864.771
g/d
-
Nitrogen balance
USDA Beltsville
75
1
21
8462
Animal
-
-
Abs_CP
2758.92
g/d
-
Nitrogen balance
USDA Beltsville
75
3
23
8866
Animal
-
-
Abs_CP
2513.43
g/d
-
Nitrogen balance
USDA Beltsville
75
4
23
9085
Animal
-
-
Abs_CP
3063.389
g/d
-
Nitrogen balance
USDA Beltsville
75
2
23
9098
Animal
-
-
Abs_CP
2597.423
g/d
-
Nitrogen balance
USDA Beltsville
75
4
23
9215
Animal
-
-
Abs_CP
2564.467
g/d
-
Nitrogen balance
USDA Beltsville
75
1
31
9085
Animal
-
-
Abs_CP
1982.884
g/d
-
Nitrogen balance
USDA Beltsville
75
1
33
8866
Animal
-
-
Abs_CP
2421.312
g/d
-
Nitrogen balance
USDA Beltsville
75
4
33
9098
Animal
-
-
Abs_CP
2269.532
g/d
-
Nitrogen balance
USDA Beltsville
75
3
33
9215
Animal
-
-
Abs_CP
2068.41
g/d
-
Nitrogen balance
USDA Beltsville
75
1
41
9215
Animal
-
-
Abs_CP
1657.879
g/d
-
Nitrogen balance
USDA Beltsville
75
2
43
8866
Animal
-
-
Abs_CP
2121.004
g/d
-
Nitrogen balance
USDA Beltsville
75
3
43
9085
Animal
-
-
Abs_CP
2098.112
g/d
-
Nitrogen balance
USDA Beltsville
75
3
43
9098
Animal
-
-
Abs_CP
1981.262
g/d
-
Nitrogen balance
USDA Beltsville
76
1
11
682
Animal
-
-
Abs_CP
2246.369
g/d
-
Nitrogen balance
USDA Beltsville
76
2
11
9035
Animal
-
-
Abs_CP
3159.295
g/d
-
Nitrogen balance
USDA Beltsville
76
3
11
9274
Animal
-
-
Abs_CP
3045.435
g/d
-
Nitrogen balance
USDA Beltsville
76
3
11
9295
Animal
-
-
Abs_CP
2609.343
g/d
-
Nitrogen balance
USDA Beltsville
76
3
11
9421
Animal
-
-
Abs_CP
3005.7
g/d
-
Nitrogen balance
USDA Beltsville
76
4
11
9472
Animal
-
-
Abs_CP
2536.533
g/d
-
Nitrogen balance
USDA Beltsville
76
1
11
9484
Animal
-
-
Abs_CP
2220.556
g/d
-
Nitrogen balance
USDA Beltsville
76
2
11
9494
Animal
-
-
Abs_CP
2570.52
g/d
-
Nitrogen balance
Infusion Data Table
DataSet
PubID
TrialID
TrtID
SubjectID
InfusionLocation
UID
RepUID
VarName
VarValue
VarUnits
DayofPeriodStart
DayofPeriodStop
TimeofDayStart
TimeofDayStop
Dairy Digestion (NRC 2001)
83
1
214
-
Abomasum
-
1
Inf_Acet
0
%
-
-
-
-
Dairy Digestion (NRC 2001)
83
1
215
-
Abomasum
-
1
Inf_Acet
0
%
-
-
-
-
Dairy Digestion (NRC 2001)
83
1
216
-
Abomasum
-
1
Inf_Acet
0
%
-
-
-
-
Dairy Digestion (NRC 2001)
83
1
217
-
Abomasum
-
1
Inf_Acet
0
%
-
-
-
-
Dairy Digestion (NRC 2001)
123
1
46
-
Duodenum
-
1
Inf_Acet
0
%
-
-
-
-
Dairy Digestion (NRC 2001)
123
1
46100
-
Duodenum
-
1
Inf_Acet
0
%
-
-
-
-
Dairy Digestion (NRC 2001)
123
1
46200
-
Duodenum
-
1
Inf_Acet
0
%
-
-
-
-
Dairy Digestion (NRC 2001)
123
1
46300
-
Duodenum
-
1
Inf_Acet
0
%
-
-
-
-
Dairy Digestion (NRC 2001)
123
1
47
-
Duodenum
-
1
Inf_Acet
0
%
-
-
-
-
Dairy Digestion (NRC 2001)
123
1
47100
-
Duodenum
-
1
Inf_Acet
0
%
-
-
-
-
Dairy Digestion (NRC 2001)
123
1
47200
-
Duodenum
-
1
Inf_Acet
0
%
-
-
-
-
Dairy Digestion (NRC 2001)
123
1
47300
-
Duodenum
-
1
Inf_Acet
0
%
-
-
-
-
Dairy Digestion (NRC 2001)
123
1
48
-
Duodenum
-
1
Inf_Acet
0
%
-
-
-
-
Dairy Digestion (NRC 2001)
123
1
48100
-
Duodenum
-
1
Inf_Acet
0
%
-
-
-
-
Dairy Digestion (NRC 2001)
123
1
48200
-
Duodenum
-
1
Inf_Acet
0
%
-
-
-
-
Dairy Digestion (NRC 2001)
123
1
48300
-
Duodenum
-
1
Inf_Acet
0
%
-
-
-
-
Dairy Digestion (NRC 2001)
123
1
49
-
Duodenum
-
1
Inf_Acet
0
%
-
-
-
-
Dairy Digestion (NRC 2001)
123
1
49100
-
Duodenum
-
1
Inf_Acet
0
%
-
-
-
-
Dairy Digestion (NRC 2001)
123
1
49200
-
Duodenum
-
1
Inf_Acet
0
%
-
-
-
-
Dairy Digestion (NRC 2001)
123
1
49300
-
Duodenum
-
1
Inf_Acet
0
%
-
-
-
-
Dairy Digestion (NRC 2001)
163
1
163
-
Duodenum
-
1
Inf_Acet
0
%
-
-
-
-
Dairy Digestion (NRC 2001)
163
1
164
-
Duodenum
-
1
Inf_Acet
0
%
-
-
-
-
Dairy Digestion (NRC 2001)
163
1
165
-
Duodenum
-
1
Inf_Acet
0
%
-
-
-
-
Dairy Digestion (NRC 2001)
163
1
166
-
Duodenum
-
1
Inf_Acet
0
%
-
-
-
-
Dairy Digestion (NRC 2001)
83
1
214
-
Abomasum
-
1
Inf_ADF
0
g
-
-
-
-
In Vitro Data Table
DataSet
PubID
TrialID
TrtID
SubjectID
PlateID
WellID
SubTrtID
Site_sample
Cell_Type
Day_Sample_InVivo
Day_Sample_InVitro
Time_Sample
VarName
VarValue
VarUnits
N
SE
SD
VarType
Microbial Data (2019)
541
1
8
34
-
-
-
Rumen
Protozoa
InVit_BiomConcn
1.385
g/L
-
-
-
In Vitro Assays
Microbial Data (2019)
541
1
9
35
-
-
-
Rumen
Protozoa
InVit_BiomConcn
5.273
g/L
-
-
-
In Vitro Assays
Microbial Data (2019)
542
1
10
46
-
-
-
Rumen
Fungi
InVit_BiomConcn
0.009
g/L
-
-
-
In Vitro Assays
Microbial Data (2019)
542
1
10
47
-
-
-
Rumen
Fungi
InVit_BiomConcn
0.02
g/L
-
-
-
In Vitro Assays
Microbial Data (2019)
542
1
10
48
-
-
-
Rumen
Fungi
InVit_BiomConcn
0.022
g/L
-
-
-
In Vitro Assays
Microbial Data (2019)
542
1
10
49
-
-
-
Rumen
Fungi
InVit_BiomConcn
0.006
g/L
-
-
-
In Vitro Assays
Microbial Data (2019)
542
1
10
50
-
-
-
Rumen
Fungi
InVit_BiomConcn
0.006
g/L
-
-
-
In Vitro Assays
Microbial Data (2019)
538
1
3
21
-
-
-
Rumen
Bacteria
InVit_CellConcn
10300000
/mL
-
-
-
In Vitro Assays
Microbial Data (2019)
538
1
3
22
-
-
-
Rumen
Bacteria
InVit_CellConcn
6300000
/mL
-
-
-
In Vitro Assays
Microbial Data (2019)
538
1
3
23
-
-
-
Rumen
Bacteria
InVit_CellConcn
7500000
/mL
-
-
-
In Vitro Assays
Microbial Data (2019)
538
1
4
24
-
-
-
Rumen
Bacteria
InVit_CellConcn
30000
/mL
-
-
-
In Vitro Assays
Microbial Data (2019)
538
1
4
25
-
-
-
Rumen
Bacteria
InVit_CellConcn
50000
/mL
-
-
-
In Vitro Assays
Microbial Data (2019)
538
1
4
26
-
-
-
Rumen
Bacteria
InVit_CellConcn
40000
/mL
-
-
-
In Vitro Assays
Microbial Data (2019)
538
1
5
27
-
-
-
Rumen
Bacteria
InVit_CellConcn
3e+05
/mL
-
-
-
In Vitro Assays
Microbial Data (2019)
538
1
5
28
-
-
-
Rumen
Bacteria
InVit_CellConcn
9e+05
/mL
-
-
-
In Vitro Assays
Microbial Data (2019)
538
1
5
29
-
-
-
Rumen
Bacteria
InVit_CellConcn
6e+05
/mL
-
-
-
In Vitro Assays
Microbial Data (2019)
539
1
6
30
-
-
-
Rumen
Bacteria
InVit_CellConcn
0
/mL
-
-
-
In Vitro Assays
Microbial Data (2019)
540
1
7
31
-
-
-
Rumen
Bacteria
InVit_CellConcn
64511690.866
/mL
-
-
-
In Vitro Assays
Microbial Data (2019)
540
1
7
32
-
-
-
Rumen
Bacteria
InVit_CellConcn
0
/mL
-
-
-
In Vitro Assays
Microbial Data (2019)
540
1
7
33
-
-
-
Rumen
Bacteria
InVit_CellConcn
23857417.187
/mL
-
-
-
In Vitro Assays
Microbial Data (2019)
542
1
10
36
-
-
-
Rumen
Bacteria
InVit_CellConcn
2195143924.463
/mL
-
-
-
In Vitro Assays
Microbial Data (2019)
542
1
10
37
-
-
-
Rumen
Bacteria
InVit_CellConcn
6902795383.81
/mL
-
-
-
In Vitro Assays
Microbial Data (2019)
542
1
10
38
-
-
-
Rumen
Bacteria
InVit_CellConcn
7898797862.994
/mL
-
-
-
In Vitro Assays
Microbial Data (2019)
542
1
10
39
-
-
-
Rumen
Bacteria
InVit_CellConcn
1489947617.261
/mL
-
-
-
In Vitro Assays
Microbial Data (2019)
542
1
10
40
-
-
-
Rumen
Bacteria
InVit_CellConcn
1823794912.903
/mL
-
-
-
In Vitro Assays
Genome Transcripts Table
DataSet
PubID
TrialID
TrtID
SubjectID
PlateID
WellID
SubTrtID
Site_sample
Cell_Type
Day_Sample_InVivo
Day_Sample_InVitro
Time_Sample
VarName
VarValue
VarUnits
N
SE
SD
VarType
Microbial Data (2019)
537
1
1
1
-
-
-
Rumen
Bacteria
GPT_ForPrim
TGGGTGTTAGAAATGGATTC
-
-
-
-
Genomic, proteomic, and transcript data
Microbial Data (2019)
537
1
1
2
-
-
-
Rumen
Bacteria
GPT_ForPrim
GCTTCTGAAGAATCATTTGAAG
-
-
-
-
Genomic, proteomic, and transcript data
Microbial Data (2019)
537
1
1
3
-
-
-
Rumen
Bacteria
GPT_ForPrim
GGTATGGGATGAGCTTGC
-
-
-
-
Genomic, proteomic, and transcript data
Microbial Data (2019)
537
1
1
4
-
-
-
Rumen
Bacteria
GPT_ForPrim
ACTGCAGCGCGAACTGTCAGA
-
-
-
-
Genomic, proteomic, and transcript data
Microbial Data (2019)
537
1
1
5
-
-
-
Rumen
Bacteria
GPT_ForPrim
GGTTATCTTGAGTGAGTT
-
-
-
-
Genomic, proteomic, and transcript data
Microbial Data (2019)
537
1
1
6
-
-
-
Rumen
Bacteria
GPT_ForPrim
GGACGATAATGACGGTACTT
-
-
-
-
Genomic, proteomic, and transcript data
Microbial Data (2019)
537
1
1
7
-
-
-
Rumen
Bacteria
GPT_ForPrim
TGCTAATACCGAATGTTG
-
-
-
-
Genomic, proteomic, and transcript data
Microbial Data (2019)
537
1
1
8
-
-
-
Rumen
Bacteria
GPT_ForPrim
CTAATACCGCATAACAGCAT
-
-
-
-
Genomic, proteomic, and transcript data
Microbial Data (2019)
537
1
1
9
-
-
-
Rumen
Bacteria
GPT_ForPrim
TGGGAAGCTACCTGATAGAG
-
-
-
-
Genomic, proteomic, and transcript data
Microbial Data (2019)
537
1
1
10
-
-
-
Rumen
Bacteria
GPT_ForPrim
AGTCGAGCGGTAAGATTG
-
-
-
-
Genomic, proteomic, and transcript data
Microbial Data (2019)
537
1
2
11
-
-
-
Rumen
Bacteria
GPT_ForPrim
TGGGTGTTAGAAATGGATTC
-
-
-
-
Genomic, proteomic, and transcript data
Microbial Data (2019)
537
1
2
12
-
-
-
Rumen
Bacteria
GPT_ForPrim
GCTTCTGAAGAATCATTTGAAG
-
-
-
-
Genomic, proteomic, and transcript data
Microbial Data (2019)
537
1
2
13
-
-
-
Rumen
Bacteria
GPT_ForPrim
GGTATGGGATGAGCTTGC
-
-
-
-
Genomic, proteomic, and transcript data
Microbial Data (2019)
537
1
2
14
-
-
-
Rumen
Bacteria
GPT_ForPrim
ACTGCAGCGCGAACTGTCAGA
-
-
-
-
Genomic, proteomic, and transcript data
Microbial Data (2019)
537
1
2
15
-
-
-
Rumen
Bacteria
GPT_ForPrim
GGTTATCTTGAGTGAGTT
-
-
-
-
Genomic, proteomic, and transcript data
Microbial Data (2019)
537
1
2
16
-
-
-
Rumen
Bacteria
GPT_ForPrim
GGACGATAATGACGGTACTT
-
-
-
-
Genomic, proteomic, and transcript data
Microbial Data (2019)
537
1
2
17
-
-
-
Rumen
Bacteria
GPT_ForPrim
TGCTAATACCGAATGTTG
-
-
-
-
Genomic, proteomic, and transcript data
Microbial Data (2019)
537
1
2
18
-
-
-
Rumen
Bacteria
GPT_ForPrim
CTAATACCGCATAACAGCAT
-
-
-
-
Genomic, proteomic, and transcript data
Microbial Data (2019)
537
1
2
19
-
-
-
Rumen
Bacteria
GPT_ForPrim
TGGGAAGCTACCTGATAGAG
-
-
-
-
Genomic, proteomic, and transcript data
Microbial Data (2019)
537
1
2
20
-
-
-
Rumen
Bacteria
GPT_ForPrim
AGTCGAGCGGTAAGATTG
-
-
-
-
Genomic, proteomic, and transcript data
Microbial Data (2019)
538
1
3
21
-
-
-
Rumen
Bacteria
GPT_ForPrim
GGTATGGGATGAGCTTGC
-
-
-
-
Genomic, proteomic, and transcript data
Microbial Data (2019)
538
1
3
22
-
-
-
Rumen
Bacteria
GPT_ForPrim
CCCTAAAAGCAGTCTTAGTTCG
-
-
-
-
Genomic, proteomic, and transcript data
Microbial Data (2019)
538
1
3
23
-
-
-
Rumen
Bacteria
GPT_ForPrim
TCTGGAAACGGATGGTA
-
-
-
-
Genomic, proteomic, and transcript data
Microbial Data (2019)
538
1
4
24
-
-
-
Rumen
Bacteria
GPT_ForPrim
GGTATGGGATGAGCTTGC
-
-
-
-
Genomic, proteomic, and transcript data
Microbial Data (2019)
538
1
4
25
-
-
-
Rumen
Bacteria
GPT_ForPrim
CCCTAAAAGCAGTCTTAGTTCG
-
-
-
-
Genomic, proteomic, and transcript data